2020
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2006426117
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The role of turbulent fluctuations in aerosol activation and cloud formation

Abstract: Aerosol indirect effects are one of the leading contributors to cloud radiative properties relevant to climate. Aerosol particles become cloud droplets when the ambient relative humidity (saturation ratio) exceeds a critical value, which depends on the particle size and chemical composition. In the traditional formulation of this problem, only average, uniform saturation ratios are considered. Using experiments and theory, we examine the effects of fluctuations, produced by turbulence. Our measurements… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
54
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
6
54
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As argued in Liu et al (1995), Chandrakar et al (2020), and Wu and McFarquhar (2018), the shape of CDSD is critical for understanding cloud processes. In fact, the CDSDs in adiabatic clouds are not necessarily narrow as they can be broadened due to processes such as turbulent fluctuation and/or giant cloud condensation nuclei (Chandrakar et al, 2016;Desai et al, 2018;Feingold et al, 1999;Johnson, 1982;Lu, Liu, Niu, & Xue, 2018;McGraw & Liu, 2006;Prabhakaran et al, 2020;Yin et al, 2000). The measurements from cloud-penetrating airplane observations indicate that the CDSDs are usually broad (Gerber et al, 2008;Lu, Liu, Niu, & Xue, 2018;Small & Chuang, 2008;Yum et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As argued in Liu et al (1995), Chandrakar et al (2020), and Wu and McFarquhar (2018), the shape of CDSD is critical for understanding cloud processes. In fact, the CDSDs in adiabatic clouds are not necessarily narrow as they can be broadened due to processes such as turbulent fluctuation and/or giant cloud condensation nuclei (Chandrakar et al, 2016;Desai et al, 2018;Feingold et al, 1999;Johnson, 1982;Lu, Liu, Niu, & Xue, 2018;McGraw & Liu, 2006;Prabhakaran et al, 2020;Yin et al, 2000). The measurements from cloud-penetrating airplane observations indicate that the CDSDs are usually broad (Gerber et al, 2008;Lu, Liu, Niu, & Xue, 2018;Small & Chuang, 2008;Yum et al, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(2009) (see also Chen et al., 2016, 2018) and those introduced by Prabhakaran et al. (2020) and explored more completely here. In Section 4.2, these two perspectives were introduced in the context of our experiments.…”
Section: Implications For the Atmosphere And Summarymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…(2009) considered polydisperse particles exposed to a single peak supersaturation in a parcel (vertical lines in the figure) while in Prabhakaran et al. (2020) and here we have examined particles of a single size and composition (vertical lines in the figure) which are exposed to a distribution of saturation ratios in the environment.…”
Section: Implications For the Atmosphere And Summarymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in the atmosphere it is difficult to quantify the fluctuations in S. (See Siebert and Shaw (2017) for one example.) Our goal, in a laboratory setting, is to quantify the effects of fluctuations in S on activation and the drop size distribution (Chandrakar et al, 2016(Chandrakar et al, , 2017(Chandrakar et al, , 2020bPrabhakaran et al, 2020). (Laboratory investigations of the effect of turbulence on collision-coalescence would likely require facilities with greater vertical extents than are currently available (Shaw et al, 2020).)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%