2012
DOI: 10.1007/s12103-012-9163-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Role of Vicarious and Anticipated Strain on the Overlap of Violent Perpetration and Victimization: A Test of General Strain Theory

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 100 publications
0
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Agnew, vicarious collective strains are more likely to lead to negative coping strategies when they are high in magnitude and considered unjust, when they affect closely related others, when they are directly witnessed or experienced by the individual, when they are unresolved, and seen to be likely to affect the individual. Research generally supports the link between vicarious strain-in particular physical victimization-and offending behavior (Baron 2009;Lin, Cochran, and Mieczkowski 2011;Zavala and Spohn 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Background General Strain Theorymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…According to Agnew, vicarious collective strains are more likely to lead to negative coping strategies when they are high in magnitude and considered unjust, when they affect closely related others, when they are directly witnessed or experienced by the individual, when they are unresolved, and seen to be likely to affect the individual. Research generally supports the link between vicarious strain-in particular physical victimization-and offending behavior (Baron 2009;Lin, Cochran, and Mieczkowski 2011;Zavala and Spohn 2013).…”
Section: Theoretical Background General Strain Theorymentioning
confidence: 88%
“…A growing list of empirical studies have established a link between gang membership and violent victimization (Barnes et al 2012;Childs et al 2009;Decker and Pyrooz 2010;DeLisi et al 2009;Fox et al 2013;Gibson et al 2009;Gover et al 2009;Katz et al 2011;Ozer and Engel 2011;Pyrooz et al 2014;Rufino et al 2012;Sweeten et al 2013;Spano et al 2008;Taylor et al 2007Taylor et al , 2008Zavala and Spohn 2013). Drawn from wide and diverse research designs that span a range of demographic groups and sampling frames, this body of evidence is large enough that few would dispute the fact that gang members are victims of violence at a rate that is much higher than their peers who are not in gangs.…”
Section: Gang Membership and Violent Victimization In Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include self-control(Childs et al 2009;Fox et al 2013;Pyrooz et al 2014;Taylor et al 2007Taylor et al , 2008, neutralizations and peer commitmentTaylor et al 2007Taylor et al , 2008, routine activities and lifestyles(Katz et al 2011;Pyrooz et al 2014;Taylor et al 2007Taylor et al , 2008Zavala and Spohn 2013), and social controls(Taylor et al 2007Zavala and Spohn 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While Agnew (1992) developed GST through a social psychological lens to expand upon Merton’s (1938) original strain theory and explain juvenile delinquency, the theory has been employed to examine a multitude of criminal and delinquent behaviors. Throughout the years, the relationship between strain and crime has found continued empirical support, suggesting that as strain increases, one’s likelihood of engaging in crime or delinquency also increases (e.g., Baron, 2004, 2006; Broidy, 2001; Cullen et al, 2008; Ford & Schroeder, 2009; Manasse & Ganem, 2009; Schroeder & Ford, 2012; Stogner & Gibson, 2010, 2011; Zavala & Spohn, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%