“…Last but not least, another set of previous studies have examined this trendy topic from the perspective of the alleged relationship between smart cities, neoliberalism and socio-political urban developments (Tan and Taeihagh, 2020; Raucci and Tarquinio, 2020; Grossi and Pianezzi, 2017; Meijer et al , 2017; Hollands, 2008). However, despite these valuable efforts and attempts to provide different theoretical and empirical perspectives on the potential relationship between performance measurement and smart city governance, these research endeavours have indicated that smart city governance requires complex decisions to be made with attention to economic, social and environmental performance (Tan and Taeihagh, 2020; Raucci and Tarquinio, 2020; Grossi et al , 2020), but with not enough attention to also “political intervention” (Steccolini et al , 2020; Meijer et al , 2017), “military engagement” (Alawattage and Alsaid, 2018; Noguchi et al , 2015) and “public-private collaboration” (Mutiganda et al , 2020; Alsaid and Mutiganda, 2020) in place. Although these angles have been widely theorised in public sector management accounting research, especially in neoliberalism and its various forms of privatisation, modernisation and state budget reforms (see, e.g.…”