The roles of geological history and colonization abilities in genetic differentiation between mammalian populations in the Philippine archipelago

Abstract

Aim To test hypotheses that: (1) late Pleistocene low sea-level shorelines (rather than current shorelines) define patterns of genetic variation among mammals on oceanic Philippine islands; (2) species-specific ecological attributes, especially forest fidelity and vagility, determine the extent to which common genetic patterns are exhibited among a set of species; (3) populations show reduced within-population variation on small, isolated oceanic islands; (4) populations tend to be most highly differentiated on small, isolated islands; and (5) to assess the extent to which patterns of genetic differentiation among multiple species are determined by interactions of ecological traits and geological/geographic conditions.Location The Philippine Islands, a large group of oceanic islands in Southeast (SE) Asia with unusually high levels of endemism among mammals.Methods Starch-gel electrophoresis of protein allozymes of six species of small fruit bats (Chiroptera, Pteropodidae) and one rodent (Rodentia, Muridae).Results Genetic distances between populations within all species are not correlated with distances between present-day shorelines, but are positively correlated with distances between shorelines during the last Pleistocene period of low sea level; relatively little intraspecific variation was found within these 'Pleistocene islands'. Island area and isolation of oceanic populations have only slight effects on standing genetic variation within populations, but populations on some isolated islands have heightened levels of genetic differentiation, and reduced levels of gene flow, relative to other islands. Species associated with disturbed habitat (all of which fly readily across open habitats) show more genetic variation within populations than species associated with primary rain forest (all of which avoid flying out from beneath forest canopy). Species associated with disturbed habitats, which tend to be widely distributed in SE Asia, also show higher rates of gene flow and less differentiation between populations than species associated with rain forest, which tend to be Philippine endemic species. One rain forest bat has levels of gene flow and heterozygosity similar to the forest-living rodent in our study. Main conclusionsThe maximum limits of Philippine islands that were reached during Pleistocene periods of low sea level define areas of relative genetic homogeneity, whereas even narrow sea channels between adjacent but permanently isolated oceanic islands are associated with most genetic variation within the species. Moreover, the distance between 'Pleistocene islands' is correlated with the extent of genetic distances within species. The structure of genetic variation is strongly influenced by the ecology of the species, predominantly as a result of their varying levels of vagility and ability to tolerate open (non-forested) habitat. Readily available information on ecology Journal of Biogeography (J. Biogeogr.) (2005) 32, 229-247 ª 2005 Blackwell Publishing Ltd www.blackwellpublishing.com/jbi INTR ODU...

Is a new paradigm emerging for oceanic island biogeography?

“…For 3 example, bats within the Caribbean (Carstens et al, 2004;Dávalos, 2007), Indonesia (Hisheh et al, 1998(Hisheh et al, , 2004) and the Philippines (Heaney et al, 2005;Roberts, 2006a,b) vary greatly in the amount of gene flow, such that some genera show little geographic variation within an archipelago (because they have high gene flow), while others are broken into substantially divergent monophyletic units on each island (or set of nearby islands), which demonstrates the absence of gene flow. This is true even for bats of similar size and appearance; it seems that the ecology of the bats, especially their habitat selection (e.g.…”

Speciation dynamics in the SE Asian tropics: Putting a time perspective on the phylogeny and biogeography of Sundaland tree squirrels, Sundasciurus

“…It is possible that the Palawan Islands were connected to Borneo by land in the middle and/or late Pleistocene (Bird et al, 2005;Heaney, 1986). The islands of Greater Mindanao were connected to each other during Pleistocene low sea level stands (Heaney et al, 2005), but were separated from the Sunda shelf by a series of narrow straits of deep water and small islands (Musser and Heaney, 1985;Jones and Kennedy, 2008;Steppan et al, 2003). It is possible that the Sunda fauna colonized the Philippines via a land bridge to Palawan and then spread through the main Philippine Islands to Greater Mindanao.…”

Species’ Geographic Distributions Through Time: Playing Catch-up with Changing Climates

“…In this region, broad and relatively shallow seas separating present-day islands became land connections during globally cool periods (Voris 2000). Pleistocene warm-cool cycles then would have produced cycles of connection and isolation, which could have driven speciation pulses-however, although numerous early studies were interpreted as fitting well with this phenomenon (Peterson and Heaney 1993;Voris 2000;Heaney et al 2005), more extensive recent studies have found exceptions, suggesting that simple connection or isolation of land masses may not be sufficient to structure biodiversity (Esselstyn and Brown 2009;Esselstyn et al 2010).…”