2011
DOI: 10.1007/s10710-011-9129-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The route to a defect tolerant LUT through artificial evolution

Abstract: Evolutionary techniques may be applied to search for specific structures or functions, as specified in the fitness function. This paper addresses the challenge of finding an appropriate fitness function when searching for generic rather than specific structures which, when combined wiacteristic of defect tolerance on the circuit. Production defects for integrated circuits are expected to increase considerably. To avoid a corresponding drop in yield, improved defect tolerance solutions are needed. In the case o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, the evolutionary experiments require further attention. More detailed information on these experiments may be gleamed from [11].…”
Section: Evolution At Transistor Level : Lut1mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As such, the evolutionary experiments require further attention. More detailed information on these experiments may be gleamed from [11].…”
Section: Evolution At Transistor Level : Lut1mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…X0, X1 and X2 are all dependent on n -the number of transistors in the circuit. As the circuit size increases, X2 increases, reflecting the increased chance of multiple defects -see [11]. Figure 5, illustrates the key elements in the evaluation with respect to equation 3's reliability evaluation.…”
Section: Trial Error and Intuitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One potential methodology for achieving this is to use Evolutionary Algorithms (EAs), which have been used in the past to optimise existing CMOS designs for a number of criteria, such as delay [36], area [32], power and yield [42]. EAs have also been used to produce new and unconventional design topologies at both the gate level [27] and device level [40], and also fault-tolerant designs [13,14]. In the majority of cases where EAs have been used, the evolved or optimised designs are not always feasible for fabrication, due to the EA using an insufficient fitness criteria to assess the solutions, which does not take account of a realistic set of factors that affect the design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other researchers have previously manipulated transistor widths whilst evolving defect tolerant topologies for look-up tables, which cope with transistor faults through the use of transistor redundancy [14]. However, the approach described in this paper differs from that of previous researchers by using a multi-objective GA with characterisation-based performance metrics (for example, propagation delay, power), in conjunction with high performance computing resources (HPC) that perform statistical SPICE simulations, in order to ensure that the designs produced have been optimised over a range of criteria and are feasible for fabrication.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%