The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics

Мусолфф, Андреас

doi:10.4324/9781315183718

Cited by 26 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 27 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The above-mentioned fact gives us the grounds to support those authors who claim that in the political discourse mainly official and publicistic styles are used [9][10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 57%

Public parliamentary discourse in Russia and Germany: speech and genre specifics

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In the article the approaches to the problem of political discourse speech genres differentiation are discussed based on the comparative analysis of the German and Russian public parliamentary speech authentic samples. The special status of the public speech phenomenon in parliamentary communication and its conditionality by parliamentary regulations are discussed. The communicative roles of plenary sessions' participants in Germany and Russia are described. In both parliaments, public parliamentary speech is exercised in a dialogue form, managed and controlled by the president of the Bundestag / presiding plenary session. The existence of common political goals of German and Russian public parliamentary communication proves the expediency of its comprehensive comparative study, taking into account extralinguistic and linguistic characteristics of public parliamentary speeches. The statements, representing the German and Russian public parliamentary speech, form a set of institutional genres, the emergence and functioning of which are predetermined by the parliamentary regulations. In both parliaments, they include a report, a statement, a question, and a reply, presented in several intragenre varieties, with specific national variants. Each of these genres is characterized by the use of specific methods of language expression, emotional utterances, rhetorical and polemical techniques It is indisputable that the language plays an important role in parliamentary communication. As J. Searle considers, like other public institutes, the language can also be considered as an institutein a narrow sense of the word. It is such an institute which, unlike other institutes, cannot be abolished by a resolution [6]. Without the language which is a cornerstone of "organizational rules of a discourse" [7], not only verbal communication in general, but establishment of modern public institutes is inconceivable. According to J. Charteris-Black, for designation of the language of public parliamentary communication we can accept the term "parliament language" [8].

show abstract

“…The above-mentioned fact gives us the grounds to support those authors who claim that in the political discourse mainly official and publicistic styles are used [9][10].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 57%

Public parliamentary discourse in Russia and Germany: speech and genre specifics

et al. 2019

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Political communication in late modernity is crucially characterized by the erosion of traditional cleavages and party affiliations, by the deployment of branding practices, and increasing (digital) mediatization and visualization (cf. Higgins 2018;Schill 2012;Wodak and Forchtner 2018b). Moreover, and partly an effect of the proliferation of (audio-)visual media formats (cf.…”

Section: Politics (Visual) Political (Social Media) Communication and Authenticitymentioning

confidence: 99%

Indexing authenticity in visual political (social media) communication: a metapragmatics-based analysis of two visual registers of the authentic

Blasch

2021

Multimodal Communication

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this paper, I apply a metapragmatics-based approach to visual communication, combined with adapted concepts of Social Semiotics (“visual modality”) and CDA-oriented visual analysis (“canons of use”), to reconstruct two visual registers of authenticity which are prevailing within a social media photo sample of recent Austrian chancellor Sebastian Kurz (Facebook, Instagram; total of 84 photos), posted during the parliamentary elections in 2017. Triangulated with the discourse analysis of the marketing manager’s metapragmatic reflections on this social media campaign, the study shows how the partly intertwined registers of (1) “professional sensorism” (as a blended register comprising emblems of sensory modality and balanced composition, thereby drawing on the conceptualization of authenticity as sensory and affective experience of “now”) and (2) “voyeuristic fictionalization” (comprising indexicals associated with fiction genre, and based on the notion of authenticity as arising via “unnoticed observing”) are conceptualized and implemented as a—superior—visual stylization, acting as a social positioning, in mediatized political communication.

show abstract

“…Дискурсивный подход также является распространенной основой для исследования знаменитостей как в форме дискурсивно-исторического, так и критического дискурс-анализа [Akturan, 2011;Johns, English, 2016;Livio, Afriat, 2019;Zeglen, Ewen, 2020]. Так, рассматривая дискурсивное событие в диалектическом контексте, критический дискурс-анализ интерпретирует его как опосредованное господствующими социальными структурами и сложившимися системами властных отношений [van Dijk, 1997;Glynos et al, 2009;Wodak, Forchtner, 2018].…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Супруги Губернаторов И Их Стратегии Саморепрезентации: Знаменитости Или Домохозяйки?

Фоминых¹,

Petrov²

2021

MONITORING OF PUBLIC OPINION

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Статья теоретически обосновывает возможности применения междисциплинарного подхода к исследованию представителей российских региональных элит как знаменитостей. Эмпирическую базу исследования составила предоставленная «Минченко Консалтинг» база данных супруг высших должностных лиц субъектов РФ за 2020 г. (N = 96). Для обогащения данных использовался качественный анализ стратегий саморепрезентации супруг российских губернаторов в традиционных и социальных медиа. Оценка уровней публичности показала, что значимая часть супруг российских губернаторов скорее отказывается от какой-либо стратегии, предпочитая оставаться домохозяйками. Публичность супруг может принимать формы персональной или совместной, а эмпирически выявленные стратегии саморепрезентации имеют значимые различия. Сравнительный анализ позволил представить их в виде авторской классификации из пяти типов. Выдвинутые гипотезы о наличии у супруг губернаторов социальных маркеров-переменных, связанных с высоким уровнем публичности и следованием определенной стратегии саморепрезентации, частично нашли подтверждение.

show abstract

The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics

Cited by 26 publications

References 27 publications

Public parliamentary discourse in Russia and Germany: speech and genre specifics

Public parliamentary discourse in Russia and Germany: speech and genre specifics

Indexing authenticity in visual political (social media) communication: a metapragmatics-based analysis of two visual registers of the authentic

Супруги Губернаторов И Их Стратегии Саморепрезентации: Знаменитости Или Домохозяйки?

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About