1998
DOI: 10.1021/bi980117o
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The S0 State EPR Signal from the Mn Cluster in Photosystem II Arises from an Isolated S = 1/2 Ground State

Abstract: During oxygen evolution, the Mn cluster in Photosystem II cycles through five oxidation states, S0-S4. S0 and S2 are paramagnetic, and can be monitored by electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Recently a new EPR signal from the S0 state was discovered [Ahrling et al. (1997) Biochemistry 36, 13148-13152, Messinger et al. (1997) J. Am. Chem. Soc. 119, 11349-11350]. Here, we present a well-resolved S0 spectrum, taken at high power and low temperature. The spectrum is wider and more resolved than previously thoug… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
49
1

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
2
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…62 Older estimates in the literature place the native Δ E of spinach to ca. 6 cm –1 , 47 while for methanol-treated samples previous estimates included 12 cm –1 , 50 30 cm –1 , 47 and 36.5 cm –1 . 46 Therefore, our principal target here is to identify methanol interaction sites that correlate with an increase of Δ E .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…62 Older estimates in the literature place the native Δ E of spinach to ca. 6 cm –1 , 47 while for methanol-treated samples previous estimates included 12 cm –1 , 50 30 cm –1 , 47 and 36.5 cm –1 . 46 Therefore, our principal target here is to identify methanol interaction sites that correlate with an increase of Δ E .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The phenomenology of split EPR signals of both the S 1 Y Z ˙ and the S 0 Y Z ˙ states has been rationalized in terms of an increase in Δ E upon addition of methanol, 60 so a similar mode of interaction as for the S 1 and S 2 states (operating on the Mn3–Mn4 antiferromagnetic coupling) would be valid for the S 0 state as well. We prefer not to propose specific S 0 models at this point because of the more complex EPR phenomenology of this state 50,77,116,117 and remaining uncertainties in the protonation states of terminal water-derived ligands and oxo bridges. 35,72,118120 EPR studies of the S 3 state reveal a rich and complex phenomenology.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10). This means that an unbiased inspection of the inflectionpoint shift for the S 0 →S 1 transition is suggestive of a twoelectron oxidation, a presumption that is clearly unreasonable in the light of EPR results [66,73,74,75,76,77]. For the S 2 →S 3 transition, it has been reported that the edge-shift is clearly smaller than the S 1 →S 2 shift [70,71] whereas others found it to be of comparable magnitude [31,34,35].…”
Section: Empirical Approaches To Determine Oxidation Statesmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The S 0 multiline signal, centered at g ) 2, was spread over about 2000 G and has been proposed to originate from a Mn 4 cluster containing a di-µ-oxo(Mn II Mn III ) dimer (26)(27)(28). A temperature dependence study of the S 0 multiline signal has shown that the S ) 1 / 2 state responsible for the signal is an isolated ground state (29).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%