2011
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2010-1845
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Safe Environment for Every Kid Model: Impact on Pediatric Primary Care Professionals

Abstract: WHAT'S KNOWN ON THIS SUBJECT:It is well established that risk factors such as maternal depression are prevalent and jeopardize children's health and development. Pediatric primary care offers an opportunity for helping address such psychosocial problems that are connected with child abuse and neglect. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS:Results of this study indicate that the Safe Environment for Every Kid model helps pediatric health professionals address targeted psychosocial problems. The study is one of the first to exam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
77
0
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
77
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…49 Safe Environment for Every Kid uses a screening instrument, originally administered by physicians, to refer selected families to social work support. 50,51 DULCE differs from these interventions in that a specially trained FS who has established 52,53 ; DULCE, by making the visits more valuable for families, may offer another avenue for improvement in delivery of preventive health care. As health care systems become accountable for the delivery of preventive services, the cost of this intervention may be partially offset by reduction in case management costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…49 Safe Environment for Every Kid uses a screening instrument, originally administered by physicians, to refer selected families to social work support. 50,51 DULCE differs from these interventions in that a specially trained FS who has established 52,53 ; DULCE, by making the visits more valuable for families, may offer another avenue for improvement in delivery of preventive health care. As health care systems become accountable for the delivery of preventive services, the cost of this intervention may be partially offset by reduction in case management costs.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than a decade ago, Felitti et al (1998) explored relationships between, and outcomes of, various categories of childhood adversity including child abuse, neglect, caregiver's substance use, caregiver's depressive symptoms, family violence, criminality and children's outcomes. Social and environmental risk factors outlined in the above studies are not difficult to elicit in a CP setting if appropriate training and psychosocial support are available, as Dubowitz et al (2011b) suggests. Wills et al (2008) reported on a substantial improvement in the quality of assessment and identification of child and partner abuse in New Zealand, resulting in increased referrals from health to child protective services, by training health workers in identifying both child and intimate partner abuse and improving partnerships between agencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…When coupled with referrals to community-based resources, some screening protocols have been shown to reduce childhood abuse and to decrease family distress. [46][47][48] Most importantly for the FCPMH, many of these screening protocols have been well received by families and are not time intensive (Table). 32,33 Although the 2-generation approach is promising, discussing family-level needs can be difficult for both the family and the provider.…”
Section: Family-level Screening and Responsementioning
confidence: 99%