2008
DOI: 10.1177/003335490812300506
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Saskatchewan Farm Injury Cohort: Rationale and Methodology

Abstract: The Saskatchewan Farm Injury Cohort (SFIC) is a major new Canadian study that was developed to evaluate potential causes of injury among farmers and their family members. The cohort involves 2,390 farms and 5,492 farm people being followed over a two-year period. The article describes the rationale and methodology for the baseline and longitudinal components of this study. The SFIC is one of the first studies to apply population health theory to the modeling of risks for injury in a defined Canadian population… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
63
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

5
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Information on the variables described below was collected by self-administered, mailed questionnaires based on the Population Health Framework [21,22]. Some measures of lifestyle factors, occupational exposures, and socio-economic status used in our questionnaire were adopted from previous research studies that had validated these measures [22][23][24].…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Information on the variables described below was collected by self-administered, mailed questionnaires based on the Population Health Framework [21,22]. Some measures of lifestyle factors, occupational exposures, and socio-economic status used in our questionnaire were adopted from previous research studies that had validated these measures [22][23][24].…”
Section: Variablesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As part of an existing study of injury and its determinants on Saskatchewan farms, we conducted a cross-sectional survey 21. This provided a data source and a platform for the present AHSN evaluation.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Clusters of farms were nested within rural municipalities. Lists of AHSN and non-AHSN rural municipalities in each of the three main agricultural regions, defined by soil zone and thus type of agriculture, were identified 21. Fifty rural municipalities (25 each AHSN and non-AHSN) were proportionally sampled for each soil zone.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In brief, approximately one-half (4234 farms; 52%) of 8169 farms that were initially approached returned the baseline questionnaire; 923 farms were ineligible, 887 farms refused participation and 34 farms returned partially completed questionnaires. This left 2390 eligible farms (out of 7246; or 33%) for consideration in the current analysis Pickett et al, 2008).…”
Section: Samplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…To ensure face validity, the questionnaire was piloted on a sub-sample of 50 farm people who were not subsequently enrolled in the study Pickett et al, 2008). In the full baseline survey, a designated adult respondent on each participating farm completed the baseline questionnaire.…”
Section: Data Collection and Study Designmentioning
confidence: 99%