2001
DOI: 10.1920/co.ifs.2001.0085
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Saving Gateway and the Child Trust Fund: Is asset-based welfare 'well fair'?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For there to be positive saving in the Saving Gateway account and also a reduction in total asset holdings, requires that, on the optimal saving path, every £ 1 saved in the Saving Gateway is associated with more than £ 1 dissaved in the bank account. That asset-holding actually falls is a stronger …nding than that implied by the pure borrow-to-save strategy discussed in Emmerson and Wake…eld (2003), under which every £ 1 saved in the Saving Gateway is precisely o¤set by £ 1 dissaved elsewhere.…”
Section: Asset-holdingmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For there to be positive saving in the Saving Gateway account and also a reduction in total asset holdings, requires that, on the optimal saving path, every £ 1 saved in the Saving Gateway is associated with more than £ 1 dissaved in the bank account. That asset-holding actually falls is a stronger …nding than that implied by the pure borrow-to-save strategy discussed in Emmerson and Wake…eld (2003), under which every £ 1 saved in the Saving Gateway is precisely o¤set by £ 1 dissaved elsewhere.…”
Section: Asset-holdingmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…While there remains an important debate as to the merits of asset-based welfare more generally (see e.g. Emmerson and Wake…eld, 2001), this paper focuses on its proposed implementation in the form of the Saving Gateway.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Other commentators have challenged these findings, or conducted other research that is more doubtful about the asset‐effect (Emmerson and Wakefield 2001; McKay and Kempson 2003). For example, Emmerson and Wakefield have raised several questions about the NCDS study.…”
Section: Theoretical Strand One: Social Policymentioning
confidence: 99%