2010
DOI: 10.1093/cs/32.1.61
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The School Social Work Skill Set and Positive Behavior Support: A Good Match

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This individual-focused orientation is not supported by a strong evidence base, nor is it consistent with primary prevention models embedded in the three-tiered (i.e., primary, secondary, and tertiary) model that has become a significant feature of school mental health practice over the past two decades, namely, multitiered systems of support (MTSS; Barrett, Eber, & Weist, 2013). MTSS models, such as response to intervention (RTI) and positive behavior intervention and supports (PBIS) frameworks (Anderson-Ketchmark & Alvarez, 2010;Avant & Lindsey, 2016;Lewis, Mitchell, Bruntmeyer, & Sugai, 2016), have been shown in intervention research literature to improve school climate, enhance positive student behaviors, and increase student achievement (Horner et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This individual-focused orientation is not supported by a strong evidence base, nor is it consistent with primary prevention models embedded in the three-tiered (i.e., primary, secondary, and tertiary) model that has become a significant feature of school mental health practice over the past two decades, namely, multitiered systems of support (MTSS; Barrett, Eber, & Weist, 2013). MTSS models, such as response to intervention (RTI) and positive behavior intervention and supports (PBIS) frameworks (Anderson-Ketchmark & Alvarez, 2010;Avant & Lindsey, 2016;Lewis, Mitchell, Bruntmeyer, & Sugai, 2016), have been shown in intervention research literature to improve school climate, enhance positive student behaviors, and increase student achievement (Horner et al, 2009).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Historically, psychologists and behavioral specialists, with a background and training in behavior analysis, have primary responsibility for conducting FBAs and creating BIPs, but SSWs can also play a significant role in some components of the process (Clark, 1998). Moreover, it is clear a significant portion of SSWs’ training in evidence-based practices positions them to be leaders in this process because they are proficient in interviewing, engaging family members, data collection, documenting intervention progress with other multidisciplinary team members, and evaluating outcomes that are integral to the BIP process (Anderson-Ketchmark & Alvarez, 2010; Avant, 2014; Constable & Massat, 2009; Kelly et al, 2010).…”
Section: What Are Functional Behavior Assessments (Fbas)?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Standard 3 highlights the importance of conducting FBAs, while the latter highlights the importance of the BIP in ensuring effective practice. The expectation of these standards is to support SSWs in adopting an ecological perspective to conduct assessment and implement prevention practices such as those practiced within the framework of FBAs and environmental changes in the classroom (Anderson-Kathmark & Alvarez, 2010; Avant, 2014). An ecological perspective and model of practice focuses on examining how individuals’ environments shape them into who they are (Teater, 2014).…”
Section: Why Fbas Matter To the Sswmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PBS uses problem-solving strategies to improve student behavior by building on strengths and has been found to improve the learning environment of the school and, more specifically, the classroom (Simonsen & Sugai, 2009). A better learning environment improves student achievement and student attendance (Anderson-Ketchmark & Alvarez, 2010;Lepage, Kratochwill, & Elliott, 2004).…”
Section: Proactivementioning
confidence: 99%