The Science of Reading: Four Forces That Modified, Distorted, or Ignored the Research Finding on Reading Comprehension

Abstract

The science of reading is the latest version of the reading wars brought to national attention by the popular press. Although most of the popular press has focused on phonics and early reading, in this article, we chose to study what happened to the research on reading comprehension. By the beginning of the 21st century, there had emerged a mainstream view of reading comprehension and comprehension instruction. However, four factors distorted, impeded, and swamped the research findings. (1) Commercial publishers fit comprehension instruction into a curricular format that distorted the intent of the research. (2) The No Child Left Behind Act, with its high-stakes testing and concomitant interim assessments, moved the focus in schools from developing comprehension to passing tests. (3) The publishers' criteria for the Common Core State Standards promoted instruction that ran contrary to research findings. (4) Problems with the educational research, publication, development, and dissemination process itself further weakened the effect of research on practice. We conclude with suggestions for researchers to better communicate their results and procedures to other educators, suggestions for how the research community can have a greater impact on the development and review of commercial reading materials and policy initiatives, and suggestions for improving the education of future researchers, administrators, and teachers.T he science of reading is the latest iteration of the reading wars, this time brought to national attention by the popular media. Over the past three years,

Experimental Evidence on the Robustness of Coaching Supports in Teacher Education

“…Outcome for "Supporting Text-Focused Instruction." We developed the rubrics for the supporting text-focused instruction scenario (Study 2; online Appendix A3 includes the rubric) from seminal work on teacher feedback by Hattie and Timperley (2007) and a wealth of reading comprehension research that has foregrounded the importance of teacher facilitation of meaningful student interactions with a text (Boardman et al, 2018;Dewitz & Graves, 2021;Duke et al, 2011). In particular, we focused on teachers' text-based questions that (a) supported active engagement with text, (b) helped students revise textual misunderstandings, and (c) made text-based arguments (Deshler et al, 2007;Hillocks, 2010;McKeown et al, 2009;Reznitskaya et al, 2009;Shanahan et al, 2010).…”

Building Mental Models of Writers: Writing Aloud in Writing Instruction

“…Four components drawn from metacognition theory teachers can explicitly weave in their write‐alouds include (a) what strategy/skill is being used (declarative knowledge), (b) the thinking and steps for how to complete the strategy/skill (procedural knowledge), (c) when the strategy/skill should be applied (conditional knowledge), and (d) why the strategy/skill is helpful for the writing task (conditional knowledge; Graham, 2020; Pratt, 2020; Pratt & Hodges, 2023b). When teachers use think‐alouds in literacy instruction, the conditional knowledge component explaining when and why is often the most difficult or most frequently omitted component in their explicit explanation (Dewitz & Graves, 2021; Graham, 2020). Yet, explaining when writers choose to use certain strategies/skills and why it helps them complete writing tasks help elucidate the decision‐making writers use.…”

Modeling higher order thinking skills and metacognitive awareness in English reading comprehension among university learners

“…Furthermore, the cognitive skills which contribute to reading performance can be optimized by such refined assessment. The cognitive processes are the basic components of comprehension since they simultaneously represent the cognitive and reading ability of the learner (Dewitz and Graves, 2021). For that matter, modern reading assessment should be designed on cognitive principles so that learners' HOTS levels can be explicitly mapped.…”