The title of the article by Portnow et al. 1 is not suitable because there is uneven coverage of the development of PET imaging devices and inadequate coverage of radiopharmaceuticals or their translational applications. There are some key conceptual and factual errors as well.Contrary to the authors' contention, half-life of Carbon-14 is approximately 5,730 years, while halflife of Fluorine-18 is only 110 minutes: the latter's half-life is shorter-not longer-than the former's. Moreover, there was a need for an alternative agent for glucose imaging because Carbon-14 decays by beta particle formation and beta particles cannot penetrate the human body for image formation. Gamma rays formed after the positron decay of fluorine-18 and other positron emitters can penetrate the human body to enable emission imaging in living humans. Additionally, authors show an image of a " 18 F-spiperone" scan but do not mention the pioneering studies by Wagner et al.2,3 on neuroreceptor imaging in the brain with 3-N-[11 C] methylspiperone. Dr. Wagner is considered a forefather of nuclear medicine. 4 Finally, PET can also be used for cerebellar and brainstem imaging-in addition to cerebral imaging-which is of relevance for several brain disorders.Author Response: Michael Okun, Leah Portnow, David Vaillancourt, Gainesville, FL: We appreciate the comments by Dr. Singhal. Dr. Singhal is correct that we should have used the word "shorter half-life" instead of "longer half-life" when describing the half-life of FDG compared with 14CDG. We are grateful that this error was noticed. We also agree that other elements of PET imaging including radiopharmaceuticals and the translational applications should have been included. In prior drafts, we had a more developed version consistent with these suggestions, but with the word count limits we were constrained to focus on key areas that were of particular interest to our research.