The Scope and Limits of Overimitation in the Transmission of Artefact Culture*

Abstract

Children are generally masterful imitators, both rational and flexible in their reproduction of others' actions. After observing an adult operating an unfamiliar object, however, young children will frequently overimitate, reproducing not only the actions that were causally necessary but also those that were clearly superfluous. Why does overimitation occur? We argue that when children observe an adult intentionally acting on a novel object, they may automatically encode all of the adult's actions as causally meaningful. This process of automatic causal encoding (ACE) would generally guide children to accurate beliefs about even highly opaque objects. In situations where some of an adult's intentional actions were unnecessary, however, it would also lead to persistent overimitation. Here, we undertake a thorough examination of the ACE hypothesis, reviewing prior evidence and offering three new experiments to further test the theory. We show that children will persist in overimitating even when doing so is costly (underscoring the involuntary nature of the effect), but also that the effect is constrained by intentionality in a manner consistent with its posited learning function. Overimitation may illuminate not only the structure of children's causal understanding, but also the social learning processes that support our species' artefact-centric culture.

How copying affects the amount, evenness and persistence of cultural knowledge: insights from the social learning strategies tournament

“…However, copying offers advantages over trial-and-error learning even if observers receive no payoff information, because even blind copiers benefit from the aforementioned filtering of behaviour by the copied agents [10]. This insight could help explain the extreme reliance of children on imitation, leading them faithfully to copy even superfluous actions in a demonstrated task [45]. When children copy adults, they are typically taking advantage of decades of information filtering by the adult, making it on average simply more efficient to take their word for it.…”

Social learning and the development of individual and group behaviour in mammal societies

“…It now seems likely that neither imitation nor teaching per se provide the basis for cultural evolution. Rather, certain cognitive mechanisms that humans incorporate into some of their imitative and pedagogical activities may be important [88,89]. For instance, non-human teaching is restricted to particular adaptive contexts (e.g.…”

The psychology of rituals: An integrative review and process-based framework

“…This perspective is further supported by findings that children with autism are capable of imitating, but tend not to do so spontaneously (Carpenter, 2006). This imitative function in children offers a possible explanation of how ritual artifacts find their way into meaningful cultural practices, starting early in life (Legare & Nielsen, 2015;Lyons, Damrosch, Lin, Macris, & Keil, 2011). Across development, this process then becomes elaborated in adults, where rituals, particularly credible practices that are hard to fake (Harris, 2012;Henrich, 2009), signal the establishment of a culture's most cherished values (Sosis, 2004).…”