1992
DOI: 10.1007/bf02340835
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The screening for common drugs of abuse in whole blood by means of EMIT-ETS and FPIA-ADx urine immunoassays

Abstract: The purpose of the paper was to compare the performance of ETS (EMIT) and ADx (FPIA) analyzers for screening blood samples for drugs of abuse after 2 alternative pretreatment procedures (acetone precipitation and ultrafiltration). Cannabinoids, benzodiazepines and benzoylecgonine were not detectable with both assays after ultrafiltration. The detectability of morphine in blood ultrafiltrates was distinctly lower than after acetone precipitation. The comparison of results obtained with ETS and ADx after acetone… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Amphetamine immunoassay after Extrelut extraction of whole blood or serum samples is not reliable and was stopped after a series of experiments using both amphetamine or methamphetamine as reference substances. This result is in agreement with the findings of Maier et al (1992) as well as with Bogusz and co-workers (1990). Both authors had used an acetone precipitation prior to their FPIA measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Amphetamine immunoassay after Extrelut extraction of whole blood or serum samples is not reliable and was stopped after a series of experiments using both amphetamine or methamphetamine as reference substances. This result is in agreement with the findings of Maier et al (1992) as well as with Bogusz and co-workers (1990). Both authors had used an acetone precipitation prior to their FPIA measurements.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 95%
“…Therefore existing urine assays had been adapted for the examination of blood samples. Previously reported methods for the screening of whole blood for common drugs of abuse include EMIT and FPIA immunoassays after precipitation of the blood samples with either methanol (Peel et al, 1981;Asselin et al, 1988;Gjerde et al, 1990), acetone (Lewellen et al, 1988;Bogusz et al, 1990;Maier et al, 1992); N,N-dimethylformamide (Blum et al, 1989;Klinger et al, 1990), trichloroacetic acid (McCord, 1988) or liquidlliquid extraction (Slightom et al, 1978;Slightom et al, 1982). The purpose of this paper was to develop a method based on a homogenous immunoassay for the rapid screening of opiates, benzodiazepines, benzoylecgonine, barbiturates and methadone from autopsy, police and hospital blood samples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FPIA method gave more precise results, particurlaly in the case of autopsy blood and the method was applied for drug screening in autopsy and police blood samples. The results (both positive and negative) were in agreetment with those obtained with chromatography [8] Performance of FPIA inmunoassays compared EMIT immunoassay has been also carried out regarding to drugs of abuse considering two alternative pretretment procedures of the samples, acetone precipitation and ultrafiltration [22].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 55%
“…Immunochemical screening of femoral blood samples from both cases, performed by means of EMIT-ETS assay [11], revealed positive reaction on opiates. The samples of blood (ca.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 98%