2011
DOI: 10.1007/s00170-011-3262-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The selection of milling parameters by the PSO-based neural network modeling method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…They also demonstrated that delamination factor and surface roughness depends on feed and cutting speed during the milling process of carbon fibre reinforced composites [2]. Farahnakian et al [3] made investigations on polyamide added with Nano clay and concluded that feed and speed are the major factors influencing the surface roughness. Davim et al [4] studied the machining aspects of milling on medium density fibre boards and reported that feed and speed have more influence on surface roughness.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They also demonstrated that delamination factor and surface roughness depends on feed and cutting speed during the milling process of carbon fibre reinforced composites [2]. Farahnakian et al [3] made investigations on polyamide added with Nano clay and concluded that feed and speed are the major factors influencing the surface roughness. Davim et al [4] studied the machining aspects of milling on medium density fibre boards and reported that feed and speed have more influence on surface roughness.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Farahnakian et al [23] studied end-milling with PSO combined with a neural network (NN) algorithm to predict surface roughness and cutting forces. Cus and Zuperl [1] compared the PSO, GA and SA techniques to estimate the cutting force, the best results were obtained with PSO.…”
Section: Conventional Machiningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The attempts are also made by researchers to maximize the production rate (or minimize machining time) using genetic algorithm (Aggarwal & Xirouchakis, 2012), simulated annealing (Rao & Pawar, 2010), artificial bee colony (Rao & Pawar, 2010), particle swarm optimization (Rao & Pawar, 2010;Gao et al, 2012), harmony search algorithm (Zarei et al, 2009), cuckoo search algorithm (Yildiz, 2012), and teaching learning based optimization algorithm (Pawar & Rao, 2013). Considering cutting force as an objective, researchers employed particle swarm optimization (Farahnakian et al, 2011), for optimization of milling process parameters. Multiobjective optimization for milling process is attempted by researchers using posteriori approaches namely non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm (NSGA) (Wang et al, 2006) and multi-objective particle swarm optimization (MPSO) (Yang et al, 2011).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%