Water Distribution Systems Analysis 2010 2011
DOI: 10.1061/41203(425)19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Self-Cleaning Velocity in Practice

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
38
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
2
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our analysis shows that for common DWDS conditions, a large range of settling velocities u s , and shear stress thresholds for incipient motion, θ c , and resuspension, θ rs , can be expected, because of the strong sensitivity to the average bulk flow velocityū f , particle diameter, d p , and density, ρ p . The theoretical model predicts u s , θ c , and θ rs values that are compatible with previously determined values of θ c and θ rs (or their velocity counterparts) and u s that were derived from field measurements and modeling for Dutch DWDSs Blokker et al, 2010) or lab experiments with drinking water from Australian utilities (Ryan et al, 2008). However, a model that takes into account these dependencies is expected to result in a more comprehensive and generically applicable model to determine particle accumulation.…”
Section: Outlook and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Our analysis shows that for common DWDS conditions, a large range of settling velocities u s , and shear stress thresholds for incipient motion, θ c , and resuspension, θ rs , can be expected, because of the strong sensitivity to the average bulk flow velocityū f , particle diameter, d p , and density, ρ p . The theoretical model predicts u s , θ c , and θ rs values that are compatible with previously determined values of θ c and θ rs (or their velocity counterparts) and u s that were derived from field measurements and modeling for Dutch DWDSs Blokker et al, 2010) or lab experiments with drinking water from Australian utilities (Ryan et al, 2008). However, a model that takes into account these dependencies is expected to result in a more comprehensive and generically applicable model to determine particle accumulation.…”
Section: Outlook and Concluding Remarkssupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Discolouration material clearly does build up in the trunk mains observed in this paper, this is despite the relatively high velocity percentiles shown in Table 1 that vastly exceed the 'self-cleaning' velocity ranges (0.25 m/s-0.4 m/s) associated with smaller distribution pipes [3,28]. This agrees with the findings of other authors conducted on large diameter pipes (i.e., over 200 mm), which find no evidence for self-cleaning velocities or shear stresses [18,24,29].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…For the simulations that follow, the demands were set at the expected average daily value multiplied by a peaking factor of 1.3 to represent the highest demand over the course of a day. Field work by Blokker et al () suggests that the threshold for self‐flushing pipes is between 0.10 and 0.25 m/s, and the lower threshold of 0.10 m/s is used here.…”
Section: Design Of the Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%