The Self in Procedural Fairness

Sedikides, Constantine; Hart, Claire M.; Cremer, David De

doi:10.1111/j.1751-9004.2008.00156.x

Cited by 30 publications

(28 citation statements)

References 71 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…It has mainly been considered as a theory of intragroup process, and has been studied most often in terms of how the group affect the individual. Indeed, decision‐making situations studied in the relational model involve a specific target person who is being treated (un)fairly as an individual, and because of this his or her treatment has only relevance for this individual in terms of his or her interpersonal relationships, or in other words, the treatment primarily impacts the relational self (Sedikides & Brewer, 2001; Sedikides, Hart, & De Cremer, 2008). For instance, an employee can be treated procedurally fair or unfair and this affects his or her perceptions and behavior.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Procedural fairness enacted by societal actors increases social trust and social acceptance among ethnic minority members through the promotion of sense of societal belonging

Valcke

Hiel

Onraet

et al. 2020

J Applied Social Pyschol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

overviews). When an authority makes a decision that affects someone, people are inclined to assess its fairness or unfairness. These fairness perceptions may have pervasive effects on people's attitudes, values, and behavior (Tyler & Blader, 2003), ultimately having a profound impact on how they feel and react within the context of their social groups (De Cremer & Tyler, 2005; Tyler & Lind, 1992). Fairness has long been considered mainly in terms of distributive fairness, referring to the perception of fairness of received outcomes and resource allocations (Cropanzano & Ambrose, 2001). However, numerous studies have shown that not only tangible outcomes themselves are important, but also the degree to which fair procedures are applied to arrive at those outcomes (Folger & Konovsky,

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Procedural fairness enacted by societal actors increases social trust and social acceptance among ethnic minority members through the promotion of sense of societal belonging

Valcke

Hiel

Onraet

et al. 2020

J Applied Social Pyschol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Research shows that individuals with uncertain identities are particularly sensitive to variations in procedural justice (De Cremer & Sedikides, 2005; see also Sedikides et al, 2008). In one study, participants who felt more uncertain about whether they belonged in a group showed an increase in affiliation or identification in response to being granted voice and fair procedures (De Cremer, Van Knippenberg, Van Dijke, & Bos, 2004).…”

Section: A Identity Uncertainty and Malleabilitymentioning

confidence: 99%

“…An authority figure treating an adolescent with respect can thus signal to that young person that the group as a whole values them, heightening their feelings of identification with that group as well as their sense of self‐esteem (Tyler, Degoey, & Smith, ). Procedural fairness can affect all aspects of self, including the individual, relational, and collective by reducing uncertainty, providing self‐enhancement, affirming status, and conveying belonging (Sedikides, Hart, & De Cremer, ). Conversely, the absence of fairness or the experience of unfair, aversive treatment by any authority figure may be similarly or even more informative.…”

Section: Part 2: Reconceptualizing Adolescent Cognitionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adolescent cognition and procedural justice: Broadening the impact of research findings on policy and practice

Granot

Tyler

2019

Social & Personality Psych

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research on adolescent social cognition has had an enormous impact on how the justice system conceptualizes adolescent legal responsibility and deals with adolescents who commit crimes. Such research also has broader implications for adolescent legal socialization, which have been largely underdeveloped. A renewed effort to connect psychological research with legal policy must expand beyond these beginnings to focus on all adolescents and their engagement in broader social institutions. Specifically, a consideration of the unique capacities for growth and development during the adolescent years should be leveraged toward fostering positive outcomes like community identity, academic and social achievement, and the development of an orientation toward law based upon legitimacy and trust. Studies suggest that a key component of positive socialization is dealing with authorities one experiences as procedurally just. Researchers focused on issues of juvenile justice should also expand their focus to consider how the social climate in institutions such as schools can be designed to take advantage of the unique capacities adolescents have for exploring identity and connecting with peers in developing their orientation to the law and legal authorities.

show abstract

“…It is the accuracy in procedures in company's decisions [12]. Lambert in this work describes impartiality as an important component of organizational environment and employment.…”

Section: Perceived Procedural Justicementioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Justices, Training, and Co-Ordination on Government Employees’ Job Satisfaction: A Case of Pakistan

Abbas¹,

Asmi²,

Ahmad³

et al. 2017

JHRSS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research seeks to investigate the influence of different public sector organizational antecedents on government employees' job satisfaction. Extensive reviews of literature revealed perceived procedural justice, distributive justice, esprit de corps and job training as the most referred antecedents of employees' job satisfaction. To empirically test the study hypotheses, data were collected from 332 personnel working in National Savings (Public sector investment bank in Pakistan). Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was used to analyze the data using SPSS Statistics 23 and AMOS 21. The results of this research generally support the hypothesis proposing the relationships between organizational antecedents (procedural and organizational justice and esprit de corps) and job satisfaction, except the association between employee's training and job satisfaction. The study helps in formulating policies regarding workforce and labor management by providing in-depth insight to the concerned authorities of various government organizations. This research, in addition to limitations, provides some tangible future research directions for future researchers in the light of its findings.

show abstract

The Self in Procedural Fairness

Cited by 30 publications

References 71 publications

Procedural fairness enacted by societal actors increases social trust and social acceptance among ethnic minority members through the promotion of sense of societal belonging

Procedural fairness enacted by societal actors increases social trust and social acceptance among ethnic minority members through the promotion of sense of societal belonging

Adolescent cognition and procedural justice: Broadening the impact of research findings on policy and practice

Impact of Justices, Training, and Co-Ordination on Government Employees’ Job Satisfaction: A Case of Pakistan

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About