1997
DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis.

Abstract: In this review, the authors examine the basis for the mnemonic superiority that results from relating material to the self. A meta-analysis confirms the expected self-reference effect (SRE) in memory, with self-referent encoding strategies yielding superior memory relative to both semantic and otherreferent encoding strategies. Consistent with theory and research that suggest self-reference (SR) produces both organized and elaborate processing, the SRE was smaller (a) when SR is compared with other-reference (… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

98
1,045
8
13

Year Published

1999
1999
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,176 publications
(1,164 citation statements)
references
References 95 publications
98
1,045
8
13
Order By: Relevance
“…In Experiment 1, we showed that we can produce similarly reduced memory performance for other tasks that do not obviously overlap with basic-level category labeling (e.g., judging the orientation of an familiar object). Our data suggest that a critical feature of the original results may not be that labeled items are forgotten as much as making preference judgments for objects results in superior memory relative to a variety of other incidental encoding tasks (Symons & Johnson, 1997). Experiment 2 examined a secondary finding in Lupyan (2008) which found that typicality ratings could also results in lower memory compared to a preference judgement task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Experiment 1, we showed that we can produce similarly reduced memory performance for other tasks that do not obviously overlap with basic-level category labeling (e.g., judging the orientation of an familiar object). Our data suggest that a critical feature of the original results may not be that labeled items are forgotten as much as making preference judgments for objects results in superior memory relative to a variety of other incidental encoding tasks (Symons & Johnson, 1997). Experiment 2 examined a secondary finding in Lupyan (2008) which found that typicality ratings could also results in lower memory compared to a preference judgement task.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…Consistent with this view, Lupyan (2008) found that response times were typically longer for preference judgments than for labeling trials, indicating that participants may have been processing the items more deeply. In addition, numerous studies have demonstrated a memory advantage for encoding items in relation to the self (see Symons & Johnson, 1997 for a review).…”
Section: Does Labeling Cause Forgetting? If So Why?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in these studies, retrieval performance is better for information that has been encoded in reference to the self than for information that has been processed semantically or in reference to other people. This wellknown cognitive phenomenon, named the Self Reference Effect (SRE; Rogers et al, 1977), is a strong characteristic of human cognition since it has been observed in various populations including healthy older people (Gutchess et al, 2007), with various materials and various paradigms at encoding and recognition and with different designs (for a review see Symons and Johnson, 1997).…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More general reviews of related areas have addressed episodic memory and the frontal lobes (Wheeler, Stuss, & Tulving, 1997), self as an organization of knowledge (Greenwald, 1980), autobiographical memory (Conway & Rubin, 1993), and the development of autobiographical memory (Fitzgerald, 1986;Howe & Courage, 1997). Symons and Johnson (1997) provide a review of the literature on the self-reference effect in memory, which is discussed below in the context of several of the studies in this area. Klein, Loftus, and others have done significant work on the nature of trait selfknowledge (e.g., Klein, Babey, & Sherman, 1997;Klein, Loftus, & Plog, 1992;Klein, Loftus, & Sherman, 1993;Klein, Sherman, & Loftus, 1996), as well as work on the nature of trait otherknowledge (e.g., Klein & Loftus, 1990;Klein, Loftus, Trafton, & Fuhrman, 1992).…”
Section: Psychological Selfmentioning
confidence: 99%