1994
DOI: 10.1006/jtbi.1994.1051
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Selfish Herd Revisited: Do Simple Movement Rules Reduce Relative Predation Risk?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
61
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
61
0
Order By: Relevance
“…a potential strike location) nearest neighbour (NN) [11] individuals moves towards closest neighbour in space 2 nearest neighbours (2NN) [12] individuals moves towards the average location of 2 nearest neighbours group centre (GC) [13,21] individuals move towards the area in the centre of all individuals within the group local crowded horizon (LCH) [14] individuals moves towards the area with the densest concentration of conspecifics; closer individuals have a stronger influence on direction, whereas distant individuals exert a weaker force; the perception function used is f(x) ¼ 1/ (1 þ kx), where x is the distance from the focal individual, and k ¼ 0.375 [14] rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc. R. Soc.…”
Section: Results (A) Movement Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…a potential strike location) nearest neighbour (NN) [11] individuals moves towards closest neighbour in space 2 nearest neighbours (2NN) [12] individuals moves towards the average location of 2 nearest neighbours group centre (GC) [13,21] individuals move towards the area in the centre of all individuals within the group local crowded horizon (LCH) [14] individuals moves towards the area with the densest concentration of conspecifics; closer individuals have a stronger influence on direction, whereas distant individuals exert a weaker force; the perception function used is f(x) ¼ 1/ (1 þ kx), where x is the distance from the focal individual, and k ¼ 0.375 [14] rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc. R. Soc.…”
Section: Results (A) Movement Rulementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simple rules can, however, result in more rapid initial reduction in DOD area [17], which might be particularly important when animals have little time to respond following detection of a predatory threat [16]. Simple rules have been criticized for their inability to produce the dense groups seen in nature [12,14], whereas more complex rules may be cognitively too complex for animals to follow [20,21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The elegance of the selfish herd has endeared it as a framework within which to interpret the behaviour of prey in response to predators, and more than 600 studies on a diverse array of taxa (Morton et al 1994) have provided support for it. While these studies have successfully quantified increased cohesiveness of groups when exposed to predators (Viscido 2003), shown that individuals prefer central to peripheral positions within a group (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presumably, a fast NN animal could easily invade a population using slow NN, leading to the evolution of faster escape responses. The speed of decision-making may also be important: complex movement rules have been criticized [12,13] on the basis that they may be cognitively too demanding for animals to follow. Incorporating a 'thinking time' into each movement step could account for the complexity of the calculations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…-Multiple nearest neighbour (nNN). Individuals move towards the average location of several (n) nearest neighbours [12]. For simplicity, we consider only n ¼ 3 here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%