2010
DOI: 10.1177/0011392109348542
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sense of Belonging in New Urban Zones of Transition

Abstract: In most modern sociological literature, it is a rarity to find analyses suggesting that social bonds and the sense of belonging can be strong in socially deprived areas. In the classic Chicago tradition of sociology, in the works of Park et al. and in Louis Wirth’s The Ghetto, residential areas are described both as places in which the social bonds are loose and places with strong bonds. However, a focal point in this article is that the sense of place and belonging are related to the type and the quality of l… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
9
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Geographical mobility was associated by all participants with social mobility; that is, it was treated as a pathway to increase quality of life and improve socioeconomic conditions as well as to diminish stigmatized features of place identity. However, those who actually experienced residential mobility tended to maintain deep emotional affinities to their stigmatized neighborhoods, something consistent with similar results in international research (Jorgensen, 2010; Kirkness, 2014; Manzo et al, 2008; Ortega, 2014). These results are aligned with some studies focused on the subjective implications of social mobility, as people may feel as an outsider in the new place, and indebted with the place of origin, feeling that they have to give back to the childhood neighborhood (e.g., Castillo, 2016; De Gaulejac, 2008; Salinas & Riquelme, 2015; Walkerdine, 2003):
Maybe I will work for the wealthy, to win more money, but I will also work in deprived neighbourhoods.
…”
Section: Social Exclusion Place and Stigmasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Geographical mobility was associated by all participants with social mobility; that is, it was treated as a pathway to increase quality of life and improve socioeconomic conditions as well as to diminish stigmatized features of place identity. However, those who actually experienced residential mobility tended to maintain deep emotional affinities to their stigmatized neighborhoods, something consistent with similar results in international research (Jorgensen, 2010; Kirkness, 2014; Manzo et al, 2008; Ortega, 2014). These results are aligned with some studies focused on the subjective implications of social mobility, as people may feel as an outsider in the new place, and indebted with the place of origin, feeling that they have to give back to the childhood neighborhood (e.g., Castillo, 2016; De Gaulejac, 2008; Salinas & Riquelme, 2015; Walkerdine, 2003):
Maybe I will work for the wealthy, to win more money, but I will also work in deprived neighbourhoods.
…”
Section: Social Exclusion Place and Stigmasupporting
confidence: 86%
“…6.2 A further aspect of belonging to place which is often overlooked is the sensory. It is worth noting that Monica's local area had been subject to the effects of radical de-industrialisation and had high rates of unemployment, deprivation and population turnover, factors commonly associated with a reduced sense of belonging (Jørgensen 2010; Fields 2011). Although Monica's account of decline was a familiar one, and resonates with Harry's above, what is interesting about Monica's narrative of a diminished sense of belonging is its articulation in terms of her sensory engagement with the neighbourhood.…”
Section: Embodied Sensory Belongingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, we are sceptical of Urry's flow theory and the idea of people's general dislocation and mobility as a basic condition. It does not take into account that contemporary people can also be very rooted and attached to places, and it creates a dichotomization between the global cosmopolitan and the local attachment, which by implication is constructed as conservative, deficient or even deviant (Gullestad 2006;Jørgensen 2010;Skeggs 2004).…”
Section: And Glickmentioning
confidence: 99%