2017
DOI: 10.1111/cdev.12813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sensitive Period for Tactile Remapping Does Not Include Early Infancy

Abstract: Visual input during development seems crucial in tactile spatial perception, given that late, but not congenitally, blind people are impaired when skin-based and tactile external representations are in conflict (when crossing the limbs). To test whether there is a sensitive period during which visual input is necessary, 14 children (age = 7.95) and a teenager (LM; age = 17.38) deprived of early vision by cataracts, and whose sight was restored during the first 5 months and at age 7, respectively, were tested. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 70 publications
(135 reference statements)
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because their sight was restored at around 4.5 months, they were only deprived of visual-tactile experience in a period in which infants do not spend much time considering such multisensory content in any case. This would seem to chime with a recent study [10] which indicates that visual deprivation in the first five months of life does not impair the typical development of tactile spatial perception as it does when such deprivation continues into later infancy [11] and childhood. …”
Section: Visual-tactile Experiences In the First Months Of Lifesupporting
confidence: 71%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Because their sight was restored at around 4.5 months, they were only deprived of visual-tactile experience in a period in which infants do not spend much time considering such multisensory content in any case. This would seem to chime with a recent study [10] which indicates that visual deprivation in the first five months of life does not impair the typical development of tactile spatial perception as it does when such deprivation continues into later infancy [11] and childhood. …”
Section: Visual-tactile Experiences In the First Months Of Lifesupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Their result (few inhibitory receptors on foveal ganglion cells) agrees with their physiology but conflicts with earlier studies using electron microscopy [8][9][10]. Because their technique strains the limits of light microscopy, more information will be needed to get to the bottom of this.…”
mentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This suggests that extensive visual experience during the first years of life leads to a default encoding of touch in terms of external space, even in cases where taking posture into account is detrimental. In support to this idea, the deprivation of visual input during the first years of life, by congenital dense bilateral cataracts in humans, hinders the normal development of a default remapping of touch in external space (Ley et al., 2013; Azañón et al., 2018).…”
Section: Integration Of Tactile Information With Posturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been established for some time that congenitally blind adults show less interference of external spatial coordinates when locating touches on the body (Röder, Rösler, & Spence, 2004). However, one particular study with congenitally blind children who had had cataracts removed in the first months of life, indicates that visual experience plays a particular role only after 4 months of age: If cataracts were removed before 5 months of age, tactile localization developed typically (Azañón, Camacho, Morales, & Longo, 2018; see also Ley, Bottari, Shenoy, Kekunnaya, & Röder, 2013). On the basis of these findings, we predicted that 4‐month‐olds would not have gained experience of visual‐tactile spatial colocation, and would therefore not be able to differentiate colocated and noncolocated visual‐tactile stimuli.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%