1992
DOI: 10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<0418:tsotem>2.0.co;2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sensitivity of the ECMWF Model to the Parameterization of Evaporation from the Tropical Oceans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
115
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 196 publications
(119 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
4
115
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interface temperature and the sensible and latent heat fluxes to the atmosphere are determined at the same time by an implicit method from vertical di¤usivity, which is calculated in the PBL scheme. The bulk coe‰cients for the heat flux estimation follow Louis (1979) and Louis et al (1982), except those for turbulent fluxes in an unstable state follow Miller et al (1992).…”
Section: F Ocean-surface Processmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The interface temperature and the sensible and latent heat fluxes to the atmosphere are determined at the same time by an implicit method from vertical di¤usivity, which is calculated in the PBL scheme. The bulk coe‰cients for the heat flux estimation follow Louis (1979) and Louis et al (1982), except those for turbulent fluxes in an unstable state follow Miller et al (1992).…”
Section: F Ocean-surface Processmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…The boundary layer is parameterized using a diffusive equation where the mixing coefficient depends on a prescribed length scale and a diagnostic determination of the turbulent kinetic energy. The surface drag parameterization is the one used at ECMWF and includes an explicit dependance of the drag coefficient on the vertical stability of the lower atmospheric layers and the surface wind (Miller et al 1992). The model also includes a simple representation of the gravity wave drag (Boer et al 1984) A feature of the model, which is of importance for the interpretation of the present results, is the treatment of the horizontal dissipation.…”
Section: Model Description and Design Of The Experimentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The gas transfer parameterisation thus contains three empirical parameters which allow tuning to specific data sets: A (related to the thermal sublayer), B (related to bubble mediated transfer) and β (the "gustiness" parameter which is related to convective buoyancy effects (Fairall et al, 1996b), 1.0 (Miller et al, 1991) and 0.7 (Schumann, 1988) -but note that these are for air. Here we are not tuning the parameterisation to a particular data set so we take the generic values of β=1, A=1, and B=1, since these are roughly the mean of the previously published values and are a neutral choice with no scaling up or down.…”
Section: Gas Transfer Velocity Kmentioning
confidence: 99%