Averroes (Ibn Rushd) is the most important medieval commentator on Aristotle, but he holds a thoroughly unique position on intellect and hylomorphism. This chapter lays out the contours of his view, noting both its liabilities and strengths, especially in light of renewed interest in hylomorphism. Averroes builds on a liberal hylomorphism common to all hylomorphic accounts of cognition, and he properly distinguishes human beings (treated in broadly naturalist terms) from intellect (conceived in far more transcendent terms, i.e. as two completely separate substances). I argue that the result is still genuine––albeit liberal––hylomorphism, not collapsing into Cartesian substance dualism. This view is worth considering since it conserves important hylomorphic desiderata while taking seriously the perennial problem of intellect.