1973
DOI: 10.1016/0022-0965(73)90139-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The separation of place, movement, and object in the world of the infant

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
12
1

Year Published

1977
1977
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
12
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is just what happens, the bulk of the second peak being accounted for by attention to the occluder. The first advance is thus occurring at around 17 weeks in this study, a result in accordance with others (Bower et al, 1971;Bower & Paterson, 1973;Mundy-Castle & Anglin, 1973), with the second advance occurring at 22 weeks, well in advance of the age indicated by studies using other indicator behaviours (Uzgiris & Hunt, 1975;.…”
Section: Analysis: Tracking Taskssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is just what happens, the bulk of the second peak being accounted for by attention to the occluder. The first advance is thus occurring at around 17 weeks in this study, a result in accordance with others (Bower et al, 1971;Bower & Paterson, 1973;Mundy-Castle & Anglin, 1973), with the second advance occurring at 22 weeks, well in advance of the age indicated by studies using other indicator behaviours (Uzgiris & Hunt, 1975;.…”
Section: Analysis: Tracking Taskssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Harris, Cassell and Bamborough (1974) found that 2-month-old infants can already track the movement of an object against a textured field. However, Bower demonstrated that only at around 4 months do infants consistently track intentional and directed object movements (Bower, Broughton & Moore, 1971;Bower & Paterson, 1973;Bower, 1975).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…colour and form. Bower, however, has claimed that infants less than 20 weeks of age do not detect these properties of moving objects but simply respond to the movement per se of the object, and this is perceived as something quite different from the same object when stationary (Bower, 1971(Bower, , 1974Bower et al, 1971;Bower & Paterson, 1973). According to this view, when infants are presented with a moving object that stops, the infants think the stationary object is a new object and, conversely, they do not identify a stationary object with itself when moving.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%