This work is made available online in accordance with the publisher's policies. Please refer to any applicable terms of use of the publisher.
General rightsCopyright for the publications made accessible via the Queen's University Belfast Research Portal is retained by the author(s) and / or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing these publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. Although the vibro-replacement stone column technique is being deployed increasingly in soft cohesive soil deposits in which creep settlements may be significant/dominant, the majority of existing stone column settlement design methods are either non-specific or pertain to primary settlement only. Consequently, in the absence of further guidance, designers sometimes apply the same settlement improvement factor to creep settlements that they have estimated for primary settlements. In this paper, Plaxis 2D finite-element analyses carried out in conjunction with the elasto-viscoplastic soft soil creep model have indicated that settlement improvement factors are lower when creep is considered and therefore the design of stone columns ignoring creep is unconservative. These analyses were used to establish the impact of a range of relevant variables on 'primary', 'total' and 'creep' settlement improvement factors, leading to the development of a simplified empirical approach for predicting creep settlement improvement factors for use in conjunction with an existing primary settlement design method.