2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-006-9154-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SF36 Version 2: critical analyses of population weights, scoring algorithms and population norms

Abstract: The procedures reported here may be used by other researchers where local effects are suspected. The population norms presented may be of interest. There are statistical artefacts associated with T-scores that have implications for how SF36V2 data are analysed and interpreted.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

8
240
2
9

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 250 publications
(259 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
8
240
2
9
Order By: Relevance
“…The primary outcome measures were the PCS and MCS; these were converted to Australian weighted T-scores where scores range from 0 (worst possible health) to 100 (best possible health), with 50 as the mean score for the general Australian population. 19 The primary analysis investigated a difference between baseline and time point 1 (1-3 months) scores, and for this paired t-tests were used. Further time points were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance to look for differences between the baseline and additional follow-up time points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary outcome measures were the PCS and MCS; these were converted to Australian weighted T-scores where scores range from 0 (worst possible health) to 100 (best possible health), with 50 as the mean score for the general Australian population. 19 The primary analysis investigated a difference between baseline and time point 1 (1-3 months) scores, and for this paired t-tests were used. Further time points were analyzed using one-way analysis of variance to look for differences between the baseline and additional follow-up time points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Die Validität, Reliabilität und Veränderungssensitivität des Instrumentes wurden nachgewiesen [5,6,7,8,9], die internationale Vergleichbarkeit ist gegeben, und es wurde in über 20 verschiedene Sprachen übersetzt [10,11,12]. Eine Suche in der Literaturdatenbank Scopus im Januar 2013 ergab 13.820 Referenzen [13]. Die Version 2 des SF-36 (SF-36V2) misst die gleichen Bereiche wie die Version 1, enthält aber teilweise Veränderungen in der Sprache und den Antwortkategorien und soll verständlicher sein und eine noch bessere interkulturelle Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten [14,15,16].…”
Section: Hintergrundunclassified
“…Die Version 2 des SF-36 (SF-36V2) misst die gleichen Bereiche wie die Version 1, enthält aber teilweise Veränderungen in der Sprache und den Antwortkategorien und soll verständlicher sein und eine noch bessere interkulturelle Vergleichbarkeit gewährleisten [14,15,16]. Mittlerweile wurde der SF-36V2 außer in den USA [17,18,19,20] in weiteren englischsprachigen Ländern wie Australien [13], Neuseeland [21] und Großbritannien [14] und in nicht-englischsprachigen Ländern wie Brasilien [22], China [23], Schweden [24] und Spanien [25] angewendet. In Deutschland wurde er erstmalig im Jahr 2002 eingesetzt [26].…”
Section: Hintergrundunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using Australian data to calculate norm-based scores (from the 1995 Australian National Health Survey (n ¼ 18 468)) 21 helps to account for cultural differences in the way in which health and health-related quality of life are viewed between populations. 22 Based on the 36 included items, scores were calculated for each of eight domains (physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, roleemotional and mental health). 20 'Role-physical' and 'roleemotional' refer to the presence of problems with work or other daily activities as a result of physical health and mental health, respectively.…”
Section: Survey Proceduresmentioning
confidence: 99%