1969
DOI: 10.1080/05695556908974416
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shape of the Normal Work Area in the Horizontal Plane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The work surface drawing was affixed to the worktable and the participant's body median was aligned with the body median in the drawing. The work surface was adjusted to 25 mm above the seated elbow height of the participant for optimum performance, as recommended by Konz and Goel (1969). In this study, the participant was seated in an upright position with his or her back in firm contact with the backrest of the anthropometric chair and with 13 mm clearance at the body median from the work surface.…”
Section: Measurement Of Maximum Functional Reachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The work surface drawing was affixed to the worktable and the participant's body median was aligned with the body median in the drawing. The work surface was adjusted to 25 mm above the seated elbow height of the participant for optimum performance, as recommended by Konz and Goel (1969). In this study, the participant was seated in an upright position with his or her back in firm contact with the backrest of the anthropometric chair and with 13 mm clearance at the body median from the work surface.…”
Section: Measurement Of Maximum Functional Reachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, knowledge of the normal reach area and the 3-D reach volume are also important in the design process. Dimensions of the normal reach area (NRA) have been presented by several authors [19,20,21,22]. Typically the NRA dimensions are presented as 5th, 50th and 95th percentile curves.…”
Section: Ergonomic Worktation Designmentioning
confidence: 99%