1983
DOI: 10.1086/448243
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Shaping of a Canon: U.S. Fiction, 1960-1975

Abstract: JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
2

Year Published

1987
1987
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 57 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…306 t the same time that literary theorists assert the sociopolitical A nature of generic boundaries or the literary canon, and question the evaluative authority of 'literary professionals' (Fish, 1980;Ohmann, 1983;Smith, 1983;Tompkins, 1985), thousands of women and men in local book clubs across America use their readership to mark a boundary between themselves and their neighbors, and the elite among such reading groups proudly distinguish themselves from groups who 'only read trash'. Similarly, while cultural theorists doubt the very possibility of literary representation, and trace the emergence of a decentered, fragmented postmodern self (Jameson, 1984;Lyotard, 1984;Derrida, 1976), reading group members assume novels fail unless they realistically represent the world, and respond to the characters in the text almost as if they were real people.…”
Section: Reading Groups and The Postmodern Crisis Of Cultural Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…306 t the same time that literary theorists assert the sociopolitical A nature of generic boundaries or the literary canon, and question the evaluative authority of 'literary professionals' (Fish, 1980;Ohmann, 1983;Smith, 1983;Tompkins, 1985), thousands of women and men in local book clubs across America use their readership to mark a boundary between themselves and their neighbors, and the elite among such reading groups proudly distinguish themselves from groups who 'only read trash'. Similarly, while cultural theorists doubt the very possibility of literary representation, and trace the emergence of a decentered, fragmented postmodern self (Jameson, 1984;Lyotard, 1984;Derrida, 1976), reading group members assume novels fail unless they realistically represent the world, and respond to the characters in the text almost as if they were real people.…”
Section: Reading Groups and The Postmodern Crisis Of Cultural Authoritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Partimos de la necesidad de descentralizar el concepto de canon y en cualquier caso hablar de canon en plural, puesto que nuevos agentes distinguen y valoran obras y autores: a los tradicionales premios, críticos, academias, educación… se suman ahora también blogs, slams o booktubers (Achugar, 2019). Seguimos las reflexiones de Francés (2021) a propósito de la configuración del canon que plantean Ohmann (1983), y especialmente Fishelov (2010), para integrar los blogs como agentes de recomendación lectora, generadores de ecos y diálogos alrededor de las obras literarias.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified
“…This is not in itself a new idea (see eg. Ohmann, 1983 andBell, 2000), although it is one that has been marginalized by the mainstream of literary study.…”
Section: Introduction: Emic Categories and Internal Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%