2017
DOI: 10.1111/ajo.12665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The shift toward neo‐adjuvant chemotherapy and interval debulking surgery for management of advanced ovarian and related cancers in a population‐based setting: Impact on clinical outcomes

Abstract: The increasing utilisation of NACT - IDS in the setting of a large centralised clinical service has been associated with increasing rates of optimal cytoreduction and survival rates have continued to rise in excess of those achieved in the trials reported to date.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
1
15
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Following the implementation of cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate of patients with OC has increased to ~50%; however, this improvement does not match the rates for thyroid or prostate cancer ( 5 , 24 ). Advanced stage, poor tumor differentiation and large tumor size are suggested to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with OC, and other pathological data, including the increased expression of cleaved caspase-3 and the PD-L1 in OC, have also been identified as predictive factors for OC prognosis ( 4 , 25 , 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the implementation of cytoreductive surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy, the 5-year survival rate of patients with OC has increased to ~50%; however, this improvement does not match the rates for thyroid or prostate cancer ( 5 , 24 ). Advanced stage, poor tumor differentiation and large tumor size are suggested to be associated with poor prognosis in patients with OC, and other pathological data, including the increased expression of cleaved caspase-3 and the PD-L1 in OC, have also been identified as predictive factors for OC prognosis ( 4 , 25 , 26 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although complete primary debulking has been associated with higher survival in late-stage patients, 16 a lack of consensus still exists, with an Australian retrospective study finding that an increasing shift towards interval debulking was associated with increased survival. 17 Commentators argue that primary debulking should still be considered the treatment of choice for fit patients with advanced resectable disease, whereas interval debulking is more suitable for patients with poorer performance and nutritional status, who are more likely to develop post-operative morbidity and mortality. 18 Furthermore, most guidelines did not explicitly recommend extensive/ultra-radica' surgery and yet clinicians from higher performing countries were more likely than those from lower performing countries to agree with 'ultra-radical' surgery.…”
Section: Surgerymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current standard treatment strategy for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (AEOC) is primary cytoreductive surgery in combination with platinum-based first-line chemotherapy and radiotherapy or endocrine therapy ( 23 , 24 ). When adequate evaluation suggests that patients are less likely to receive a satisfactory outcome from tumor cell depletion surgery, neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) followed by interval-based nodulation (NACT-IDS) after three platinum-based chemotherapy cycles has become an increasingly common treatment strategy ( 25 28 ). Overall, research has shown that the survival rate of patients with stage III or IV OC treated with NACT-IDS is not inferior to that of patients receiving primary cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy ( 27 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%