2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-42972-4_34
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sign Test for Interval-Valued Data

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The projection-based methodology also appears useful for adopting the signed-rank test for random intervals. In particular, to verify hypothesis (26) that the population median of a sample of random intervals X X , …, n 1 equals M M M = [mid ± spr ] 0 0 0 versus the one-sided or two-sided alternative, we may transform the interval-valued observations by operator (29) as it is shown in Section 5.2 and then apply the following test statistic…”
Section: The Signed-rank Test For Random Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The projection-based methodology also appears useful for adopting the signed-rank test for random intervals. In particular, to verify hypothesis (26) that the population median of a sample of random intervals X X , …, n 1 equals M M M = [mid ± spr ] 0 0 0 versus the one-sided or two-sided alternative, we may transform the interval-valued observations by operator (29) as it is shown in Section 5.2 and then apply the following test statistic…”
Section: The Signed-rank Test For Random Intervalsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One way to escape this problem is to rewrite the null hypothesis as a conjunction of two sub‐hypotheses: one for the mid‐point and the second for spreads, and then apply two classical sign tests for each sub‐hypothesis separately. By this strategy, we obtain two separate P ‐values that should be somehow combined to obtain a final unique P ‐value (a short discussion can be found, eg, in Grzegorzewski and Śpiewak). However, both conceptual and technical problems connected with P ‐value aggregation are not insuperable.…”
Section: Nonparametric Tests In the Ontic Perspectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations