2017
DOI: 10.1002/pd.5020
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The significance of a prenatal diagnosis of right aortic arch

Abstract: The diagnosis of RAA is an indication for a detailed examination of cardiac and noncardiac structures, including the thymus. It is advisable to consider genetic testing, together with the assessment of deletion 22q11.2, especially in the case of accompanying defects. The prognosis depends on underlying cardiac and extracardiac anomalies and possibly coexisting genetic defects. Isolated anomalies are asymptomatic. © 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
23
1
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
23
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our finding of a minimum 4% incidence of 22q11 microdeletion in cases of apparently isolated RAA is lower to that of three previous comparable studies with a combined total of 130 cases of apparently isolated RAA; 102/130 (78%) had invasive prenatal testing, and 10% had 22q11 microdeletion . In contrast, six studies with a combined total of 145 cases of apparently isolated RAA reported a low uptake of invasive testing, and the overall incidence of chromosomal/genetic anomalies was only 6/145 (4%) . It is likely that the low rate of prenatal invasive testing in these studies may have underestimated the incidence of chromosomal/genetic anomalies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Our finding of a minimum 4% incidence of 22q11 microdeletion in cases of apparently isolated RAA is lower to that of three previous comparable studies with a combined total of 130 cases of apparently isolated RAA; 102/130 (78%) had invasive prenatal testing, and 10% had 22q11 microdeletion . In contrast, six studies with a combined total of 145 cases of apparently isolated RAA reported a low uptake of invasive testing, and the overall incidence of chromosomal/genetic anomalies was only 6/145 (4%) . It is likely that the low rate of prenatal invasive testing in these studies may have underestimated the incidence of chromosomal/genetic anomalies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 83%
“…In relation to prenatal management, there is contradictory evidence concerning the association with chromosomal and genetic abnormalities and therefore the option for invasive diagnostic testing. For example, in relation to the association with 22q11 microdeletion in some studies, the incidence was as high as 15% and in others as low as 0% . In relation to postnatal management, there is no clear evidence‐based pathway despite the fact that a RAA with a left arterial duct represents an anatomical vascular ring that encircles the trachea and esophagus.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Most studies detect associated cardiac, noncardiac, and genetic anomalies in a proportion of these cases supporting detailed examination and possible molecular testing. Most also report a 22q11.2 deletion in approximately 5% of those undergoing genetic testing (D'Antonio, Khalil, Zidere, & Carvalho, ; Evans et al, ; Galindo et al, ; O'Mahony, Hutchinson, McGillivray, Nisbet, & Palma‐Dias, ; Peng, Xie, Zheng, Zhou, & Lin, ; Razon et al, ; Vigneswaran et al, ; Wojtowicz et al, ), which is substantially lower than that observed in the post‐natal study (McElhinney, McDonald‐McGinn, et al, ) but consequential nonetheless. Two studies specifically reported on the rare fetal diagnosis of a left‐sided aortic arch with an aberrant right subclavian artery (Ranzini, Hyman, Jamaer, & van Mieghem, ; Rembouskos et al, ).…”
Section: The 22q112 Deletion Syndrome In the Chd Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also the number and the subject of publication in a digital database-PubMed, suggests the steady development of prenatal cardiology and different types of registries (Fig.2) at the global level, European and Polish level as well [14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28] . Although our National Registry is not perfect one and would need some improvement, still it is a unique organizational "tool" as well as prenatal cardiac defects collection.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%