1939
DOI: 10.1097/00006324-193910000-00001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Significance of Javal??s Rule

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, the results of the present study support previous findings that the human eye possesses approximately 0.50D of residual astigmatism (Mote & Fry 1939;Kratz & Walton 1949;Neumueller 1953;Loper 1959;Sarver 1963Sarver , 1969Carter 1972Carter , 1980Reading 1972). The proportion of eyes exhibiting against-the-rule, with-the-rule and oblique residual astigmatism also matches previous reports (Carter 1972(Carter , 1980.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In general, the results of the present study support previous findings that the human eye possesses approximately 0.50D of residual astigmatism (Mote & Fry 1939;Kratz & Walton 1949;Neumueller 1953;Loper 1959;Sarver 1963Sarver , 1969Carter 1972Carter , 1980Reading 1972). The proportion of eyes exhibiting against-the-rule, with-the-rule and oblique residual astigmatism also matches previous reports (Carter 1972(Carter , 1980.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Previous workers have studied residual astigmatism for the purpose of predicting ocular astigmatism from keratometric readings (Mote & Fry 1939;Kratz & Walton 1949;Neumueller 1953;Carter 1972Carter ,1980 or otherwise to determine the accuracy of correcting ametropia with spherical surfaced hard contact lenses (Sarver 1963(Sarver , 1969. The present authors are interested in the contribution of internal ocular surface toricity and misalignment to residual astigmatism in human eyes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation