We have investigated the contribution of specific TATA-binding protein (TBP)-TATA interactions to the promoter activity of a constitutively expressed silkworm tRNA C Ala gene and have also asked whether the lack of similar interactions accounts for the low promoter activity of a silk gland-specific tRNA SG Ala gene. We compared TBP binding, TFIIIB-promoter complex stability (measured by heparin resistance), and in vitro transcriptional activity in a series of mutant tRNA C Ala promoters and found that specific TBP-TATA contacts are important for TFIIIB-promoter interaction and for transcriptional activity. Although the wild-type tRNA C Ala promoter contains two functional TBP binding sequences that overlap, the tRNA SG Ala promoter lacks any TBP binding site in the corresponding region. This feature appears to account for the inefficiency of the tRNA SG Ala promoter since provision of either of the wild-type TATA sequences derived from the tRNA C Ala promoter confers robust transcriptional activity. Transcriptional impairment of the wild-type tRNA SG Ala gene is not due to reduced incorporation of TBP into transcription complexes since both the tRNA C Ala and tRNA SG Ala promoters form transcription complexes that contain the same amount of TBP. Thus, the deleterious consequences of the lack of appropriate TBP-TATA contacts in the tRNA SG Ala promoter must come from failure to incorporate some other essential transcription factor(s) or to stabilize the complete complex in an active conformation.The silkworm Bombyx mori provides a clear example of regulated tRNA gene expression. The demand for fibroin, the principal protein of silk, requires highly efficient transcription and translation of the fibroin gene in cells of the silk gland. Translational efficiency in these cells is maximized by the quantitative adaptation of the tRNA population to the composition of fibroin: 44% glycine, 29% alanine, and 12% serine (5,29,30,42). In the case of tRNA Ala , enrichment is achieved both by increasing the level of the constitutive type of tRNA Ala (tRNA C Ala ) and by synthesizing an additional, silk gland-specific, type (tRNA SG Ala ) (31,44). In vitro studies of representative tRNA C Ala and tRNA SG Ala genes have revealed transcription properties consistent with the patterns of tRNA C Ala and tRNA SG Ala accumulation in vivo. That is, in a variety of extracts from non-silk gland cells, the tRNA C Ala gene directs transcription much more efficiently than does the tRNA SG Ala gene, but in concentrated extracts from silk gland, the two genes are equally efficient (60). To understand how these two genes are differentially regulated, we have investigated the basis of the transcriptional impairment of the tRNA SG Ala gene that is observed under typical in vitro conditions. Transcription of silkworm tRNA Ala genes is driven by both internal and external promoter elements (26,36,56). The critical difference between the tRNA C Ala and tRNA SG Ala genes is in the interaction of their 5Ј flanking promoter elements with the transcri...