We previously computed that genes with de novo (DN) likely gene-disruptive (LGD) mutations in children with autism spectrum disorders (ASD) have high vulnerability: disruptive mutations in many of these genes, the vulnerable autism genes, will have a high likelihood of resulting in ASD. Because individuals with ASD have lower fecundity, such mutations in autism genes would be under strong negative selection pressure. An immediate prediction is that these genes will have a lower LGD load than typical genes in the human gene pool. We confirm this hypothesis in an explicit test by measuring the load of disruptive mutations in wholeexome sequence databases from two cohorts. We use information about mutational load to show that lower and higher intelligence quotients (IQ) affected individuals can be distinguished by the mutational load in their respective gene targets, as well as to help prioritize gene targets by their likelihood of being autism genes. Moreover, we demonstrate that transmission of rare disruptions in genes with a lower LGD load occurs more often to affected offspring; we show transmission originates most often from the mother, and transmission of such variants is seen more often in offspring with lower IQ. A surprising proportion of transmission of these rare events comes from genes expressed in the embryonic brain that show sharply reduced expression shortly after birth.autism spectrum disorder | gene vulnerability | disruptive mutations | biased transmission | autism genes T he past decade has seen remarkable progress in understanding genetic causation of autism spectrum disorders (ASD), confirmatory of predictions made by a "unified" genetic theory of autism proposed in 2007 (1). This theory proposes that much of ASD is caused by new mutation, sometimes directly contributing to the disorder through germ-line mutation, or transmitted by parents, especially females, who carry a variant of recent vintage without experiencing severe consequences. The theory was based largely on three sets of observations: (i) low ASD incidence in females compared with males (2), (ii) apparently dominant transmission to male children in multiplex families (1), and (iii) greater incidence of de novo (DN) copy number mutation in children with ASD than in their siblings in simplex families (3, 4). Since then, evidence for causal DN mutation has accumulated (5-8). These damaging mutations generally affect only one allele, suggesting that gene targets are dosage-sensitive, prone to dominant negative mutation, or some combination of these factors.A widely held genetic model for autism is that combinations of common variation are the major driving force. As we argue, there is little evidence for this belief. Damaging DN mutation contributes to at least 30% of ASD in simplex families (9). Among such damaging mutations are those mutations that are likely gene-disruptive (LGD) in that they create nonsense, splice-site, or small frame-shift variants (5). The estimates of contribution from DN mutations derive from the statistical...