2021
DOI: 10.3390/nano11112916
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Size and Shape Effects on the Melting Point of Nanoparticles Based on the Lennard-Jones Potential Function

Abstract: A model is proposed to calculate the melting points of nanoparticles based on the Lennard-Jones (L-J) potential function. The effects of the size, the shape, and the atomic volume and surface packing of the nanoparticles are considered in the model. The model, based on the L-J potential function for spherical nanoparticles, agrees with the experimental values of gold (Au) and lead (Pb) nanoparticles. The model, based on the L-J potential function, is consistent with Qi and Wang’s model that predicts the Gibbs-… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
16
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
0
16
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…At first, the electrochemical responses of HCN, HCN@MoS 2 , and C-MoS 2 were studied by cyclic voltammetry (Figures g–x and S8). While HCN did not show specific redox behavior (Figure g), HCN@MoS 2 -1 showed reversible redox peaks at 1.09 and 1.22 V (vs Zn/Zn 2+ ) (Figure h). While the redox peaks of HCN@MoS 2 -2 increased significantly (Figure i), those gradually decreased in an order of HCN@MoS 2 -3 > HCN@MoS 2 -4 > C-MoS 2 (Figure j–l), indicating that the reversible insertion/desertion of zinc ions to/from MoS 2 is very sensitive to its layer numbers and that the 2–3 layered MoS 2 is promising as a cathode material for ZIBs, due to the reduced lattice energy, , in addition to the possible Zn storage on surface and carbon–MoS 2 interfaces …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…At first, the electrochemical responses of HCN, HCN@MoS 2 , and C-MoS 2 were studied by cyclic voltammetry (Figures g–x and S8). While HCN did not show specific redox behavior (Figure g), HCN@MoS 2 -1 showed reversible redox peaks at 1.09 and 1.22 V (vs Zn/Zn 2+ ) (Figure h). While the redox peaks of HCN@MoS 2 -2 increased significantly (Figure i), those gradually decreased in an order of HCN@MoS 2 -3 > HCN@MoS 2 -4 > C-MoS 2 (Figure j–l), indicating that the reversible insertion/desertion of zinc ions to/from MoS 2 is very sensitive to its layer numbers and that the 2–3 layered MoS 2 is promising as a cathode material for ZIBs, due to the reduced lattice energy, , in addition to the possible Zn storage on surface and carbon–MoS 2 interfaces …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For example, the partial oxidation of MoS 2 induced structural defects, resulting in facilitated Zn insertion/desertion and enhanced electrochemical performance for aqueous ZIBs with the discharge capacities of 228–261 mAh/g (@0.1 A/g). , Recently, the graphene or carbon nanotube composites of MoS 2 have been engineered to improve conductivities and applied as cathode materials for ZIBs, showing the discharge capacities up to 180–284 mAh/g (@0.1 A/g). ,, The MoS 2 -based cathode materials for ZIBs in the recent literature studies have the 5–15 layered MoS 2 (Tables S1 and S2). We think that MoS 2 materials with the layer numbers of <5 are explorable to further facilitate Zn insertion/desertion, due to the reduced lattice energy, , and to enhance cathode performance for ZIBs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, in nanostructured material, a high surface‐to‐volume ratio can lower the melting point. [ 31,32 ] It was previously shown that size effect in nc‐Ge particles caused a downshift of the melting point to around 1100 K for particles with an average size of 5 nm. [ 33 ] In addition, melting point of amorphous solids is known to be lower than crystalline solids.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another possible reason was that the average size of BAI-DG Ms was larger than that of DG Ms, and according to Gibbs–Thompson relationship, the melting points of nanoparticles are linearly proportional to the reciprocal of the nanoparticle’s thickness or diameter [ 18 ]. In addition, the change in micelle shape may also affect the melting point [ 19 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%