2018
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-21003-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Size Congruity Effect Vanishes in Grasping: Implications for the Processing of Numerical Information

Abstract: Judgments of the physical size in which a numeral is presented are often affected by the task-irrelevant attribute of its numerical magnitude, the Size Congruity Effect (SCE). The SCE is typically interpreted as a marker of the automatic activation of numerical magnitude. However, a growing literature shows that the SCE is not robust, a possible indication that numerical information is not always activated in an automatic fashion. In the present study, we tested the SCE via grasping by way of resolving the aut… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
1
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Apparently, the fast search during the first block failed to prime par ticipants to search for the physically unique item during the second block. This does not support our hypothesis, but it does support the late inter action model, which is consistent with a growing number of studies that are incompatible with the early interaction model (Antoine & Gevers, 2016;Arend & Henik, 2015;Cohen Kadosh, Gevers, & Notebaert, 2011;Faulkenberry et al, 2016;Namdar, Ganel, & Algom, 2018;Santens & Verguts, 2011;Sobel, Puri, Faulkenberry, & Dague, 2017). Nevertheless, our failure to prime participants to attend to physical size is inconsistent with previous studies that did manage to prime participants to attend to locations and features that would optimize search efficiency (Chun & Nakayama, 2000;Olds & Fockler, 2004;Sobel et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Apparently, the fast search during the first block failed to prime par ticipants to search for the physically unique item during the second block. This does not support our hypothesis, but it does support the late inter action model, which is consistent with a growing number of studies that are incompatible with the early interaction model (Antoine & Gevers, 2016;Arend & Henik, 2015;Cohen Kadosh, Gevers, & Notebaert, 2011;Faulkenberry et al, 2016;Namdar, Ganel, & Algom, 2018;Santens & Verguts, 2011;Sobel, Puri, Faulkenberry, & Dague, 2017). Nevertheless, our failure to prime participants to attend to physical size is inconsistent with previous studies that did manage to prime participants to attend to locations and features that would optimize search efficiency (Chun & Nakayama, 2000;Olds & Fockler, 2004;Sobel et al, 2007).…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…In this respect, the invariance observed when traversing across domains supports a unified representation. Fitousi and Algom (2006) used this tactic with respect to another classic phenomenon of numerical cognition, the size-congruity effect (SCE; Henik & Tzelgov, 1982; see also, Fitousi & Algom, 2018; Namdar, Ganel, & Algom, 2018). People select the physically larger member of a pair of numerals faster when this member is also numerically larger.…”
Section: Holistic Representation Of Two-digit Numbersmentioning
confidence: 99%