1975
DOI: 10.1086/181783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size dependence of sublimation rates for interplanetary ice particles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The model parameters including the maximum modeled grain sizes are summarized in Table 1. Two different models of grains were used: pure icy grains (Patashnick and Ruprecht, 1975) and ''dirty'' icy grains (Lien, 1990) -the principal difference being the amount of silicate material contained in the grain (pure = nil dirty = 10%). While pure icy grains absorb in the UV and in the IR, ''dirty'' icy grains absorb well in the visible.…”
Section: Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (Dsmc) Kinetic Model Of Cometamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The model parameters including the maximum modeled grain sizes are summarized in Table 1. Two different models of grains were used: pure icy grains (Patashnick and Ruprecht, 1975) and ''dirty'' icy grains (Lien, 1990) -the principal difference being the amount of silicate material contained in the grain (pure = nil dirty = 10%). While pure icy grains absorb in the UV and in the IR, ''dirty'' icy grains absorb well in the visible.…”
Section: Direct Simulation Monte Carlo (Dsmc) Kinetic Model Of Cometamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sublimation rate at the surface of a comet depends on its temperature distribution, spin rate, conductivity, and composition, with estimated values of order Z 16 ∼ 10-30 (Whipple and Huenber 1976). Small ice particles are colder than a large slab and hence sublimate more slowly, with Z 16 ∼ 0.2 for R = 0.1 cm and Z 16 ∼ 7 × 10 −4 for R = 0.01 cm (Patashnick and Rupprecht 1975). Heterogeneous particles may however be warmer, with Z 16 ∼ 10 3 for R = 0.5 cm (Mukai 1986).…”
Section: Sublimation and Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many researchers have examined the sublimation rates of water ice as a function of particle size and purity, with pure water ice having a minimum in sublimation rate at ∼10-20 µm size particles (Patashnick and Rupprecht, 1975;Hanner, 1981;Mukai, 1986;Lichtenegger and Komle, 1991). However, the presence of even minute amounts of impurities in the ice increases the absorptivity (and thus the temperature) and significantly decreases the lifetime of particles (Patashnick and Rupprecht, 1975). Lifetimes on the order of hours, as observed in these look-back data, require either sub-micron pure water ice grains or dirty water ice grains >700 µm (Mukai, 1986).…”
Section: Look-back Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is unlikely that such superfine particles embedded in an ice mantle would completely segregate as a result of an impact. In addition, the small particle size observed in the interior of Tempel 1 also suggests that the size distribution of ice in comae is primary in origin, rather than a net result of the sublimation history of ice grains in the coma (e.g., Patashnick and Rupprecht, 1975).…”
Section: Implications Of the Physical Structure Of The Ejected Water Icementioning
confidence: 99%