2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size distribution of the banking sector and the effects of monetary policy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

4
12
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
4
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Olivero et al (2011aOlivero et al ( , 2011 using data for several emerging markets, found that financial sectors with lower competition levels or higher number of consolidation processes are less responsive to monetary policy shocks via the bank lending channel. Similar results are found in Ghossoub and Reed (2015) who study the optimal size distribution of the banking sector as well as the effect of banking concentration on monetary policy transmission. Finally, Aiyar et al (2016) analyze the interaction of monetary and bank capital-requirement policies for the determination of credit supply in the UK.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…For example, Olivero et al (2011aOlivero et al ( , 2011 using data for several emerging markets, found that financial sectors with lower competition levels or higher number of consolidation processes are less responsive to monetary policy shocks via the bank lending channel. Similar results are found in Ghossoub and Reed (2015) who study the optimal size distribution of the banking sector as well as the effect of banking concentration on monetary policy transmission. Finally, Aiyar et al (2016) analyze the interaction of monetary and bank capital-requirement policies for the determination of credit supply in the UK.…”
Section: Literature Reviewsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…Olivero et al (2011aOlivero et al ( , 2011b who used data for several emerging markets and reported that consolidated financial sectors with lower competition levels are less responsive to monetary policy changes. Ghossoub and Reed (2015) also confirmed the effect of the banking concentration on monetary policy transmission. Saumitra and Toto (2012) used the bank level data and concluded that small, illiquid banks are more responsive to monetary policy changes.…”
Section: Literaturesupporting
confidence: 58%
“…Kashyap and Stein (2000) and Ghossoub and Reed (2015), for example, analyze how 4 National Income and Product Accounts (NIPA) table 6.16 the bank size distribution influences the propagation of monetary policy. Gray and Malone (2008) discuss the implications of different bank size distributions for large scale private-public risk transfers.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%