2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.commatsci.2013.08.016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The size effect in mechanical properties of finite-sized graphene nanoribbon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
44
1
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
8
44
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…(11) and Eqs. (12), namely a 2 = c 2 , in accord with the results in Ref. 28, and supporting our further assumptions.…”
Section: Secular Equations Of Phonon Dispersions In Graphenesupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(11) and Eqs. (12), namely a 2 = c 2 , in accord with the results in Ref. 28, and supporting our further assumptions.…”
Section: Secular Equations Of Phonon Dispersions In Graphenesupporting
confidence: 92%
“…size effects. 12 Peng et al 13 and Wei et al 14 developed methods to obtain continuum description of non-linear elastic properties of nano-materials by expanding the elastic strain energy density in a Taylor series of strain with the fifth-or higher order terms truncated, while the independent constants were increased to fourteen. Therefore, we are motivated to seek another theoretical approach to construct a concise and effective continuum model of monolayer graphene.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We introduced a pair of single-layer GNSs with an area of 8 nm × 5 nm into a BCC α-Fe matrix with a lattice constant of 2.85 Å by removing one layer of Fe atoms in the same area, where the GNS content was 0.7 vol %. The size and volume fraction picked here is not far from reality, which based on the other references, wherein the graphene size was chosen to 2.02 × 4.25 nm 2 for graphene sheet [19] and 4-12 nm for graphene nanoribbons [23] for the MD simulations, and from experimental results, the volume fraction of graphene reinforcement was 1.13 vol % in GO reinforced iron matrix composites [20] and 0.2 vol % in graphene-based Al composites [7]. Comparing the system potential energy values after removing 1-3 layers of iron atoms, the total energy was the lowest when the GNS was added after removing only one layer of iron atoms, associated with the atomic structures, listed in Table 1.…”
Section: Model Setup and Interatomic Potentialmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The initial C-C atomic bond length used in the simulations is 1.40 Å , which is slightly lower than the average value of bond lengths in bulk graphene. Choosing such bond length helps reducing the initial stress in GNR and shortens the time needed to reach thermodynamic equilibrium (Chu and Basaran, 2012;Chu et al, 2016Chu et al, , 2014bChu et al, , 2015bHumphrey et al, 1996).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, it was observed that using the same value for D max and D min will have similar results as shown in Figure 3 (stress-strain diagrams 3, 4, 5, and 6) for the fracture strength around 100 GPa which is considered reasonable. Following the previous study by Chu et al (2014b), same D max and D min cutoff distance of 2.0 Å is used (Fu et al, 2016;LAMMPS, 2010).…”
Section: Simulationsmentioning
confidence: 99%