2004
DOI: 10.1518/hfes.46.2.349.37336
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Size-Weight Illusion in Team Lifting

Abstract: The purpose of these studies was to examine whether or not there is a size-weight illusion when participants lift containers as a team. In Experiment 1, teams of participants lifted a set of 16 containers that varied in mass and size and reported their perceptions of heaviness and volume. In Experiment 2, participants lifted the same containers individually. A size-weight illusion was demonstrated in each experiment: Reports of perceived heaviness decreased substantially as the volumes of the containers increa… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
10
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This phenomenon is very important, because any decrease in perceived heaviness of larger woks could cause the subjects to exceed the limits of safety. This finding was consistent with the previous study of Naylor and Amazeen 26) .…”
Section: Effect Of the Wok Sizesupporting
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This phenomenon is very important, because any decrease in perceived heaviness of larger woks could cause the subjects to exceed the limits of safety. This finding was consistent with the previous study of Naylor and Amazeen 26) .…”
Section: Effect Of the Wok Sizesupporting
confidence: 94%
“…In other words, the cooks may perceive larger woks to be lighter than smaller woks of the same mass 25) . If this illusion occurs in wok flipping, a larger wok could lead to cooks lifting a greater weight and exceeding their lifting capacity 26) . However, information as to how the size of the wok affects size-weight illusion and flipping capability is still insufficient.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results cannot be easily squared with a strict interpretation of Proffitt's (2006) theory of the economy of action, as it is unlikely that a purely physical account can explain the direction of the found effect. Naylor and Amazeen (2004) have demonstrated that judgments of object heaviness can be greater when lifting with another individual than when lifting alone. However, it does not follow that joint carrying is therefore actually experienced as a more difficult physical task than carrying alone.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, the stimuli were designed to be larger and heavier than the typical stimuli used in size-weight illusion research, yet not large or heavy enough to approach the limits of safety-estimates of the Lifting Indices for all stimuli in the present experiments were below 1.0. Especially considering the fact that illusion strength can vary across mass (Naylor & Amazeen, 2004), more research would need to be done to determine if the illusion strength was changed at more extreme levels of size and mass. …”
Section: Recommendations and Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%