1996
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2869.1996.00251.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children (SDSC) Construct ion and validation of an instrument to evaluate sleep disturbances in childhood and adolescence

Abstract: SUMMARYTo attempt a categorization of sleep disorders in children, we developed a 27 item Likert-type rating scale (Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children: SDSC) and assessed the psychometric properties was developed. The scale was distributed to the mothers of 1304 children (1 157 controls, mean age 9 . 8~; 147 sleep disorder subjects, mean age 9.2y, composed of four clinical groups: Insomnia 39 subjects, Hypersomnia 12 subjects, Respiratory disturbances during sleep 25 subjects and Parasomnias 7 1 subjects). T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

21
850
2
42

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,044 publications
(915 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
21
850
2
42
Order By: Relevance
“…One hundred and seventy children aged 5-10 years (mean age 8.12, SD±1.44) referred between January 2004 and May 2005 to university third level headache centres in Naples and Rome were studied with the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children questionnaire (SDSC) [8] to assess sleep habits, and were compared with 170 matched children.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One hundred and seventy children aged 5-10 years (mean age 8.12, SD±1.44) referred between January 2004 and May 2005 to university third level headache centres in Naples and Rome were studied with the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children questionnaire (SDSC) [8] to assess sleep habits, and were compared with 170 matched children.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The parents filled in a 26-item sleep questionnaire (the Sleep Disturbance Scale for Children, SDSC) that has a high internal consistency (0.79), and re-test reliability (0.71) [3]. There is one question concerning sleep duration with the response alternatives of 9-11, 9-8, 7-8, 5-7, and \5 h. Long sleepers were defined as those who were rated to sleep 9-11 h, and short sleepers were rated to sleep 8-9, 7-8, or \7 h. Another question concerned sleep latency with the response alternatives \15, 15-30, 30-45, 45-60, and [60 min.…”
Section: Sleep Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subscale scores were calculated if less than 20% of the information was missing on the corresponding scale (3 cases per scale were excluded because of this criterion). The total score was dichotomized at 39 points as suggested originally by Bruni et al [3], which was the 74th percentile in the present sample (74.4% of the cases had B39 points). This cut-off has a sensitivity of 0.89 and specificity of 0.74 when the cases with sleep disturbances were determined in a clinical evaluation [3].…”
Section: Sleep Disturbancesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The group we studied presented 5 children that lived in institutions; they were classified socially as 0. Sleep variables were assessed through the sleep disturbance scale for children (SDSC) 8 , recently validated in Brazil 9 , comprising of 26 questions and stratified answers in a Likert scale, according to frequency.…”
Section: Questionnairesmentioning
confidence: 99%