2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.665
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Slip-resistance Effect Evaluation of Floor Roughness Under Different Liquid Viscosity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For measurement methods for which the results are metrologically comparable (i.e., relate to the same physical quantity and are metrologically traceable to the same reference), the issue is relatively straightforward: a method compatibility assessment can be applied to determine whether the differences between results of measurements obtained by different methods are insignificant [ 23 , 26 ].In the present case of slip resistance evaluation, the test methods were determined by the test process’s convention, and their results do not refer to the same physical quantity. The compatibility assessment of the methods in such a case is not justified, and other indirect methods should be used to assess the differences in trueness and precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For measurement methods for which the results are metrologically comparable (i.e., relate to the same physical quantity and are metrologically traceable to the same reference), the issue is relatively straightforward: a method compatibility assessment can be applied to determine whether the differences between results of measurements obtained by different methods are insignificant [ 23 , 26 ].In the present case of slip resistance evaluation, the test methods were determined by the test process’s convention, and their results do not refer to the same physical quantity. The compatibility assessment of the methods in such a case is not justified, and other indirect methods should be used to assess the differences in trueness and precision.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, the surface on which the paints was applied was also uneven, hence the value changes. According to Chen et al [ 40 ], the obtained values were within the range adopted for the materials used—both the values obtained before exposure to sunlight and after exposure. Moreover, Chen observed that after wear, the roughness values almost doubled, which was also observed for the tested samples.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 68%
“…Falling mainly happens due to insuffi cient friction between the shoe sole and the fl oor, and the coeffi cient of friction (COF) is commonly accepted as an indicator of fl oor surface slipperiness level. The higher the COF is, the higher the degree of anti-slippery (slip resistance effect) will be (Chen et al, 2015). According to literature, factors affecting the results of friction measurement are fl oor materials, fl oor roughness, liquid/solid contaminants on fl oor, the groove design of shoes and the friction measurement device used (Liu et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2015).…”
Section: Uvodmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher the COF is, the higher the degree of anti-slippery (slip resistance effect) will be (Chen et al, 2015). According to literature, factors affecting the results of friction measurement are fl oor materials, fl oor roughness, liquid/solid contaminants on fl oor, the groove design of shoes and the friction measurement device used (Liu et al, 2010;Chen et al, 2015). There is no generally accepted method of measuring slipperiness.…”
Section: Uvodmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation