2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2014.09.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The slow and fast life histories of early birds and night owls: their future- or present-orientation accounts for their sexually monogamous or promiscuous tendencies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
22
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
4
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…More particularly, while slow life strategy is suggested to be associated with future orientation, fast life history strategy might rather be associated with presentoriented time perspectives (Del Giudice, 2014). In line with this, in a recent study, future time perspective was found to be a significant indicator of long-term mating orientation and less sexual experiences, whereas present orientation was associated with short-term mating orientation and with more sexual experiences (Ponzi et al, 2015). In addition, the exposure to harsh, unpredictable environments in childhood was shown to make individuals more present-oriented (Kruger, Reischl, & Zimmerman, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…More particularly, while slow life strategy is suggested to be associated with future orientation, fast life history strategy might rather be associated with presentoriented time perspectives (Del Giudice, 2014). In line with this, in a recent study, future time perspective was found to be a significant indicator of long-term mating orientation and less sexual experiences, whereas present orientation was associated with short-term mating orientation and with more sexual experiences (Ponzi et al, 2015). In addition, the exposure to harsh, unpredictable environments in childhood was shown to make individuals more present-oriented (Kruger, Reischl, & Zimmerman, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Specifically, it has been hypothesized that http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.12.023 0191-8869/Ó 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved. eveningness, especially in men, is associated with increased shortterm mating success as measured by the number of lifetime sexual partners (Piffer, 2010;Piffer, Gunawardane, & Custance, 2011;Randler et al, 2012) as well as with unrestricted socio-sexuality and psychometric measures of fast life histories (Ponzi et al, 2014). Despite the association between chronotype and sexual behaviors, it is not clear why evening types may have higher short-term mating success.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Likewise, selection in mice for aggression also yielded a circadian phenotype with shorter circadian periods for aggressive mice [68]. In humans, circadian chronotype has been linked to personality traits and even life-history strategies [69]. In this study, individuals self-characterized as morning-types (or larks) showed evidence for following a 'slow' life history in psychological and behavioural traits while evening-types (owls) were more likely to follow a 'fast' life history with opposing trait combinations.…”
Section: Which Pnes (Or Non-pnes) Components May Be Under Sexual Selementioning
confidence: 99%