The Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult: Measurement of smoking outcome expectancies of experienced smokers.

Copeland, Amy L.; Brandon, Thomas H.; Quinn, Edward P.

doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.4.484

Cited by 305 publications

(442 citation statements)

References 46 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

405

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Five items, based on items from a validated questionnaire (Copeland et al, 1995), assessed positive outcomes from smoking: "Smoking now will help me relax"; "Smoking now will energize me"; "A cigarette will taste good now"; "Smoking now will satisfy my cravings"; "Smoking now will help reduce boredom". Participants responded on 11-point Likert-type scales, ranging from 1 = No!…”

Section: Smoking Outcome Expectancies (Oe)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implicit attitudes to smoking are associated with craving and dependence

Waters

Carter

Robinson

et al. 2007

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Implicit Association Test (IAT) has been used to assess automatic affective responses to drug cues. Smokers (N = 57) completed the IAT at four experimental sessions. They abstained from smoking before two of the sessions (AB), and smoked normally before the other two sessions (NON). At one AB (and NON) session, they smoked a cigarette about 40 minutes before completing the IAT (S), and at the other they did not smoke (NS). Overall, participants exhibited a negative IAT effect, indicating that they found the classification task easier when smoking was paired with bad than when smoking was paired with good. Using repeated measures ANOVA, the IAT effect was made less negative by pre-session Abstinence, and made more negative by Smoking. It was most negative in the NON-S condition. Using Generalized Estimating Equations analyses, the IAT effect was positively associated with pre-task craving ratings assessed on the Questionnaire of Smoking Urges-Brief, but was not associated with a physiological measure of automatic affective responses (startles while viewing smoking vs. neutral pictures). The IAT effect was associated with scores on the Fagerstrom Test for Nicotine Dependence. In sum, automatic affective responses assessed with the smoking IAT are associated with measures of smoking motivation and dependence.

show abstract

Section: Smoking Outcome Expectancies (Oe)mentioning

confidence: 99%

Implicit attitudes to smoking are associated with craving and dependence

Waters

Carter

Robinson

et al. 2007

Drug and Alcohol Dependence

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Baseline measures included a demographic and smoking history questionnaire; the Fagerström Test for Nicotine Dependence (FTND; Heatherton, Kozlowski, Frecker, & Fagerström, 1991); the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire-Adult (Copeland et al, 1995); the BDI-II (Beck, Steer, & Brown, 1996); and the ERQ (Gross & John, 2003). Measures administered at baseline, postfilm, and postsmoking included the Urge Rating Scale (Kozlowski, Pillitteri, Sweeney, Whitfield, & Graham, 1996) and the Mood Scale (Dierner & Emmons, 1984).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Cognitive Reappraisal and Expressive Suppression Emotion Regulation Strategies in Cigarette Smokers

Fucito

Juliano

Toll

2010

Nicotine & Tobacco Research

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…A rating of 50 or higher on a 100-mm scale on either question qualified the subject on this criterion. Smoking to manage weight was assessed with the five-item weight control subscale of the Smoking Consequences Questionnaire (Copeland, Brandon, & Quinn, 1995) on which participants rate their expectations about the consequences of smoking a cigarette on a scale of 0 (completely unlikely) to 9 (completely likely). A mean score of 6 (somewhat likely) or above qualified participants on this criterion.…”

Section: Participantsmentioning

confidence: 99%