2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0010-0277(03)00042-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The SNARC effect: an instance of the Simon effect?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

15
99
3
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(118 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
15
99
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is consistent with the literature that shows Simon effects only in the fast section of the RT distribution, with slower RTs leading to null or even reversed effects (see, e.g., Mapelli, Rusconi, & Umiltà, 2003).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…This result is consistent with the literature that shows Simon effects only in the fast section of the RT distribution, with slower RTs leading to null or even reversed effects (see, e.g., Mapelli, Rusconi, & Umiltà, 2003).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The SNARC effect gradually increased from the shortest of four RT bins to the longest. Because Gevers et al's (2006) version of the SNARC task was more pure than that of Mapelli et al (2003), it is reasonable to conclude that the effect of number magnitude on the correspondence effect tends to increase as RTs get longer.…”
Section: Snarc Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Mapelli, Rusconi, and Umiltà (2003) had participants make odd-even parity judgments to numbers between 1 and 9 (excluding 5), presented on the left or right side of a display. In Experiment 1, a standard location-based Simon effect was obtained that was largest at the shortest of five RT bins and then declined, being absent at the longest bin.…”
Section: Snarc Effectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…) e.g., Mapelli, Rusconi, & Umiltà, 2003). These effects of nonhorizontal stimulus features on horizontal responses may be explained within a single theoretical framework (see Proctor & Cho, 2006), at least to a large extent.…”
Section: Notesmentioning
confidence: 99%