The Social Construction of Knowledge in the Field of Sport Management: A Social Network Perspective

Abstract

The works of Kuhn (1996) and other scholars on the social construction of knowledge suggest that great insight can be gained about an academic field of study by investigating interaction patterns between and among scholars. Using a social network perspective, the intent of this study was to empirically explore the social interaction patterns among scholars in the field of sport management. A network model of coauthorship was generated using several rounds of sampling of scholars in the field and archival data collection from relevant journals. The derived network structure was then explored both visually and quantitatively for meaningful patterns. The results of the study essentially tell a story of the evolution and current state of the field’s collaboration structure. Drawing on propositions from the literature on the sociology of scientific knowledge generation, the findings are discussed relative to what the obtained network structure might hold for sport management scholarship.

Do Academics Actually Collaborate in the Study of Interdisciplinary Phenomena? A Look at Half a Century of Research on Mergers and Acquisitions

“…There thus appears to be a paradox between increasing collaboration on the one hand, while scholars are using only a small proportion of co‐authorship opportunities available on the other hand. A similar trend is observed in management and sports management (Acedo et al ., ; Quatman and Chelladurai, ). In order to appreciate this surprising collaborative pattern, we move on next to analyzing sub‐group and author activity within the overall network.…”

A Social Network Perspective on Sport Management: The Effect of Network Embeddedness on the Commercial Performance of Sport Organizations

“…Despite this relevance, social network theory Note. *p < 0.10, **p < 0.05, ***p < 0.01 and methods have largely been neglected as a research tool within the field of sport management (Daellenbach et al, 2006;Quatman & Chelladurai, 2008). Within this study we tested the effect of the quantity and quality of ties on sport sponsorship.…”

Tensiones teóricas en torno al estudio de la ciencia. De la sociología de la ciencia al concepto de campo científico

“…Por mucho tiempo, la ciencia fue concebida como un cuerpo acumulativo de conocimiento basado en mediciones libres de valoraciones que llevan al entendimiento del mundo (Quatman, 2006). Las perspectivas para su observación varían sobre todo entre el punto de vista positivista y constructivista, que parten de valoraciones epistemológicas distintas, aspecto muy discutido en la literatura del tema.…”

“…Los estudios interesados en comprender la ciencia, se han enfocado en cómo es creada, transmitida, usada y almacenada dentro y a través de las disciplinas (Quatman, 2006). Observar la ciencia desde la ciencia es un trabajo reflexivo que no es muy antiguo.…”