2020
DOI: 10.1787/022d5e7b-en
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The Social Institutions and Gender Index (SIGI) 2019

Abstract: This series of working papers is intended to disseminate the Development Centre's research findings rapidly among specialists in the field concerned. These papers are generally available in the original English or French, with a summary in the other language. OECD Working Papers should not be reported as representing the official views of the OECD or of its member countries. The opinions expressed and arguments employed are those of the authors. This document, as well as any data and map included herein, are w… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…UK 0.12 and Australia 0.10 on the Sex Inequality Index (GII) as of 2018). Compared with Australia, the UK does poorer on some indices, like discrimination against women in regard to restricted access to resources and assets such as education (Ferrant et al, 2020). This may help explain some of the difference in the gender gaps; however, mechanisms specific to adolescence in both countries need to be investigated to help understand the gender gap difference across countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…UK 0.12 and Australia 0.10 on the Sex Inequality Index (GII) as of 2018). Compared with Australia, the UK does poorer on some indices, like discrimination against women in regard to restricted access to resources and assets such as education (Ferrant et al, 2020). This may help explain some of the difference in the gender gaps; however, mechanisms specific to adolescence in both countries need to be investigated to help understand the gender gap difference across countries.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, because UIS has not taken a leading role to improve gender and education data (Fontdevila, 2023), this task has increasingly been taken on by other initiatives, which build on scholarly work that has used critical perspectives to explore the gender data bias (Criado-Perez, 2019;Ferrant, Fuiret & Zambrano, 2020;Scott, 2020). These include 'Women Count' 3 led by UN Women, which aims to shift how gender statistics are created, used and promoted; 'Equal Measures 2030' 4 which aims to 'connect data and evidence with advocacy and action on gender equality' and the 'Evidence for Gender and Education Resource' (EGER) 5 -an interactive database which documents research and evidence on gender and education for the global education and gender community.…”
Section: Gender and Sdg 4 Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, because UIS has not taken a leading role to improve gender and education data (Fontdevila, 2023), this task has increasingly been taken on by other initiatives, which build on scholarly work that has used critical perspectives to explore the gender data bias (Criado-Perez, 2019;Ferrant, Fuiret & Zambrano, 2020;Scott, 2020). These include 'Women Count' 3 led by UN Women, which aims to shift how gender statistics are created, used and promoted; 'Equal Measures 2030' 4 which aims to 'connect data and evidence with advocacy and action on gender equality' and the 'Evidence for Gender and Education Resource' (EGER) 5 -an interactive database which documents research and evidence on gender and education for the global education and gender community.…”
Section: Gender and Sdg 4 Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%