The social phobia and anxiety inventory: concurrent validity with a clinic sample

Beidel, Déborah C.; Borden, Janet W.; Turner, Samuel M.; Jacob, Rolf G.

doi:10.1016/0005-7967(89)90093-4

Cited by 94 publications

(44 citation statements)

References 4 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…This measure is capable of discriminating socially phobic persons from those with other anxiety disorders 36 and from normal controls. 39 Testretest and internal reliability is high for this scale. 36 Convergent and discriminant validity of this instrument have also been demonstrated.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Augmentation of Exposure Therapy With D-Cycloserine for Social Anxiety Disorder

Hofmann¹,

Meuret²,

Smits³

et al. 2006

Arch Gen Psychiatry

531

367

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 96%

Augmentation of Exposure Therapy With D-Cycloserine for Social Anxiety Disorder

Hofmann¹,

Meuret²,

Smits³

et al. 2006

Arch Gen Psychiatry

531

367

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Turner et al report high internal consistency (a 5 .96) and good test-retest reliability over a 2-week interval (r 5 .86). Convergent, discriminant, and criterion-related validity studies show the value of the questionnaire for the assessment of cognitive, somatic, and behavioral dimensions of social fear [Beidel et al, 1989b[Beidel et al, , 1989cRodebaugh et al, 1999]. The SPAI was included as a measure of severity of social phobia.…”

Section: Standardized Self-report Questionnairesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Generalized social phobia and avoidant personality disorder: meaningful distinction or useless duplication?

2008

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Participants with generalized social phobia (GSP) with (n=36) and without (n=19) avoidant personality disorder (AVPD) were compared via contrasts of group means and classification analysis on purported core features of AVPD. GSP‐AVPD participants proved to be more severely impaired or distressed on some group contrasts. Cluster analysis identified two groups in the sample, with group membership significantly correlated to AVPD diagnosis. However, almost all significant findings were nullified when severity of social phobia was statistically controlled. Thus, at least where participants with social phobia are concerned, it seems most parsimonious to consider AVPD a severe form of GSP rather than a separate diagnostic category. Depression and Anxiety 0:1–12 2006. Published 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

show abstract

“…The agoraphobia subscale and the difference score (calculated by subtracting the agoraphobia score from the social phobia subscore to provide a measure of social phobia that does not reflect anxiety associated with panic) were used in the present research. The scale has been widely used and shows good reliability and validity in patient and student samples (Beidel, Borden, Turner, & Jacob, 1989;Osman et aL, 1995;.…”

Section: Measures and Proceduresmentioning

confidence: 99%