2016
DOI: 10.1007/s00779-016-0975-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

The soil moisture sensor based on soil dielectric property

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, with increasing soil temperatures, these surface forces reduce in strength, thereby causing a positive relationship between water content and temperature [39]; the variation of soil volumetric water content from 7.5% to 28% in Figure 7 also supports this conclusion. Meanwhile, the dielectric constant of water decreases with increasing temperature [29,30], and as the proportion of water contained in the soil increases, the effect of surface forces on soil particles gradually decreases, and the effect of the dielectric constant of water on the overall dielectric constant of the soil gradually increases [40]; as the temperature increases, the rate of increase in the volumetric water content of the soil shows a decrease, as evidenced by the rate of change of the curve in Figure 7; when the water in the soil is close to saturation, the effect of the dielectric constant of water on the overall dielectric constant of the soil gradually increases due to the dielectric constant which dominates the overall dielectric constant of the soil; the volumetric water content of the soil decreases slightly with increasing temperature, so the output of the sensor seems to decrease slightly with increasing temperature at 28.50% to 31.50%. Change in temperature affects not only the dielectric constant of the soil under test but also the dielectric constant [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with increasing soil temperatures, these surface forces reduce in strength, thereby causing a positive relationship between water content and temperature [39]; the variation of soil volumetric water content from 7.5% to 28% in Figure 7 also supports this conclusion. Meanwhile, the dielectric constant of water decreases with increasing temperature [29,30], and as the proportion of water contained in the soil increases, the effect of surface forces on soil particles gradually decreases, and the effect of the dielectric constant of water on the overall dielectric constant of the soil gradually increases [40]; as the temperature increases, the rate of increase in the volumetric water content of the soil shows a decrease, as evidenced by the rate of change of the curve in Figure 7; when the water in the soil is close to saturation, the effect of the dielectric constant of water on the overall dielectric constant of the soil gradually increases due to the dielectric constant which dominates the overall dielectric constant of the soil; the volumetric water content of the soil decreases slightly with increasing temperature, so the output of the sensor seems to decrease slightly with increasing temperature at 28.50% to 31.50%. Change in temperature affects not only the dielectric constant of the soil under test but also the dielectric constant [27,28].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To obtain a soil water content value from dielectric soil measurements, it is necessary to perform calibration specific to a given soil (or soilless growing medium). Results of numerous studies have proved that (after proper calibration) this type of sensors can be useful as a reliable moisture monitoring tool in sustainable use of water resources in agriculture (irrigation scheduling) and is suitable for building large-scale agricultural wireless sensor networks [HUAN et al 2017;KENNEDY et al 2003;KLAMKOWSKI, TREDER 2017].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, humidity monitoring technologies commonly fall into two categories: contact and non-contact. Non-contact technologies, such as those utilizing microwave [17][18][19][20], infrared [21,22], or ultrasonic waves, enable moisture measurement without direct contact with the medium. While these methods avoid damaging the medium, their sensing accuracy typically lags behind that of contact methods, and they often involve higher costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%